By Anna Von Reitz
We have "States", "States of the Union", and "States of States".
And since the 1950's we've had "Administrative States" sponsored as a different kind of "State of State".
Dizzy yet, and are you beginning to see all the opportunities for: (1) misunderstandings, (2) confusions, and (3) fraud schemes?
Well, it's the 1850's -- step back in time -- and all the above just got kicked into hyperdrive, because we got linguistically lazy and developed no less than three ways of referring to "States of States".
A "state of state" is a commercial term that refers to all the business apparatus that does business for or provides services to a State, and isn't the State itself.
"States of States" were routinely referred to as "Confederate States" (both North and South) and as "States", too.
The first confusion, calling States of States "Confederate States" gave everyone the impression that there was some "other" kind of State involved in the American Civil War, when there wasn't.
States of States are all Confederate States with respect to their State of the Union by definition.
In the so-called Civil War, it was State of State business organizations providing services to the States of the Union that fought the whole conflict, but that was obscured from the Public by calling the "Northern Confederation" by a different name: "the Union" which was another semantic deceit and confusion in and of itself.
Remember that a State of State is a Confederate State with respect to their State of the Union --- and North or South has nothing to do with it.
The State of Ohio is a Confederate State with respect to Ohio, just as The State of Georgia is a Confederate State with respect to Georgia.
The second confusion arises from calling a "State of State" a "State", which is a different kind of identity crisis, in which the business apparatus providing service for and to a State of the Union is mistaken for the State of the Union itself.
In this situation, The State of Ohio is mistaken for Ohio, the State.
So to make sense of this miasma we must be at pains to call a State of State a State of State and not allow ourselves any urbane shortcuts and sloppy language that leads to sloppy thinking.
A "State of State" that works for a State and its People, is a separate and distinct entity and the services that a "State of State" provides can be contracted for from different providers.
Prior to the so-called Civil War, our States of the Union had contracts with American State of State providers. Afterward, the States of the Union were bum-rushed under conditions of deceit and forced to write new State of State Constitutions that allowed British Territorial businesses to come in and take over and substitute their State of State organizations for ours.
This had the character of an illegal corporate takeover, and when it was done, nobody was the wiser. The new management wiggled its way into position very quietly, and so far as the General Public could observe, the only visible change was the definite article, "the".
Before the Civil War we had American-run institutions, for example, The State of Ohio or The State of Georgia, providing the services to the States of the Union. Afterward, we had foreign British Territorial business organizations called "the State of Ohio" or "the State of Georgia".
The only apparent change was from "The" to "the".
This Substitution Scheme led to our American Government being commandeered at a State services level and at a Federal level, at the same time, by the same Bad Actors.
The American Federal Republic doing business under "The Constitution for the united States of America" was mothballed and replaced by the British Territorial service provider doing business under "The Constitution of the United States of America".
Again, the names were very similar, differing only by "for" and "of" and the odd use of "united" instead of "United". Perhaps most importantly, there is no verbal difference at all.
This Similar Names Deceit has been used to commandeer and deceive our nation for over 160 years. It's the greatest con game in recorded history. It has also given rise to the idea that our American Government somehow ceased to exist, was "lost" in the Civil War, or left "our shores" --- and generally, the idea that we don't have a lawful government in this country, occupying the land and soil jurisdiction belonging to The United States.
That's the result of British Bunko, too.
There are dozens of lawful nations within the borders of our geography, and our States of the Union and Union States are still here, too. So although this comes as a big disappointment to certain self-interested debtor nations and numerous large corporations, our land and soil are not vacant, and not subject to any claim on abandonment.
Our people still exist and are still owed every jot of every Federal Constitution and are also owed the assets that have been locked up in the "State" Trusts that the Perpetrators formed in the wake of the Civil War and used as collateral for their own borrowing.
They are the ones in debt to us for their entire "National Debt", which is our "National Credit".
Issued by:
Anna Maria Riezinger - Fiduciary
The United States of America
In care of: Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 99652
October 19th 2025
------------------
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.