Wednesday, February 24, 2016

Nationality - A question for Anna Von Reitz

Victimhood v. Brotherhood

Anna Von Reitz  answers the following question:

On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 8:48 AM, Lalo wrote:
Hello Sir,
I was wondering if its possible to send Anna Von Reitz a email through you. 
I have a question about Nationality and the USA..

I come to find the truth about the so called African American here in the united States of America. 

I come to find that the people enslaved since the birth of this nation was falsely given title of African American to deceive them from what the Creator had given; Which was known of their true ancestry and Nationality at the time of the Emancipation Proclamation. 

United states of America is guilty of war Crimes, human trafficking and slavery to name a few and this is not mere conjuncture. 

Now I 'm trying to undo what has be done to me. and my children. 
I have authentic proof from the Library of Congress, Presidents of the united States and others. 

I want to denounce my so called United states citizenry and maintain my possessions and residence(like the native Americans).

Just like the story of Elan Gonzales (Cuba 2000) the USA has no jurisdiction of another citizen of another state/country. so how can they have jurisdiction of a child taken by acts of war and called them their own and label them African Americas?  Through propagated lies and deceit this country has taken what it promised to protect in its edicts of the US constitutions and Bill of Rights. 

There is not statute of limitation of kidnap, murder or crimes against humanity that I know of. 

Thank you,


Nigritia State Citizen,


Notice in Regard to Continuing Abuses

February 23, 2016

Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon       via Certified Mail #7006 0810 0003 3541 5717
United Nations Secretariat
New York, New York  10017

John Forbes Kerry                         via Certified Mail # 7006 0810 0003 3541 5724
2201 C Street NW
Washington, DC 20520

Notice in Regard to Continuing Abuses

Dear Sirs:

This business concerns both of you, so both are being addressed.

Mr. Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon: It is our understanding that the UNITED STATES CONGRESS named the United Nations the Trustee of our states and the laws thereof beginning in 1976 and there has been no other appointment since.   This was caused by the wholesale incorporation of former State and County government operations on the land jurisdiction of the United States, which left the land jurisdiction Public Offices (which are still owed to us) vacated though we were not informed at the time.

It is our further understanding that the service contract of the IMF sponsored UNITED STATES (INC) was defaulted in March of 2015 when that entity --together with its numerous franchises--- was declared insolvent and entered receivership.   This circumstance left the federal services contract portion of The Constitution for the united States of America vacated, too.

We became aware shortly afterward that unscrupulous persons have self-interestedly claimed that we were operating as franchises of the insolvent UNITED STATES and that vessels in commerce including STATES and ESTATE trusts named after the States of America and the living American Nationals were to be considered sureties and franchises of the UNITED STATES and sold as abandoned properties to pay the debts of the insolvent governmental services corporation.

As our Trustee in this matter, we protest to you in your office as Secretary General of the United Nations and also wish you to make our objections known to the General Secretary of the United Nations that none of these arrangements supposedly made in our behalf are true or equitable.

Tuesday, February 23, 2016

Am I Worried About John Daresh, His Attacks and His False Charges?

by Anna Von Reitz

In a word---- NO.   I am not worried by Daresh's desperate and wrong-headed accusations. Why am I not worried? 

1. Since when is it a "crime" amounting to the creation of a "shadow government" to fill vacant Public Offices?  

2. Show me where I have any kind of "organization" at all?  What's it's name?  Where are it's websites?  Where are it's meeting places?  Where is it's membership roster?  John Daresh is the one claiming to have an organization of over 5,000 members, and a stated goal of having at least four spies in every county in America.  Not me. 

3. Show me where I am wrong about any of the history and public records I have presented which lead inexorably to the conclusion that I am right and Daresh is wrong?

NLA Shows Its True Colors - by Anna Von Reitz

Anyone who cares about this country----America---- is invited to compare and contrast the information that I and Bruce Doucette and the Michigan General Jural Society have provided to the people and the VICIOUS LIES that have been perpetuated by the "National Liberty Alliance" and "John Daresh".  

We clearly stated our concerns. 

Lack of action on our properly sworn, witnessed and sealed affidavit of probable cause bound and presented to NLA last summer and now available on under the title "You Know Something Is Wrong When.....An American Affidavit of Probable Cause" was part of our concern. How is it possible for such a well-researched and referenced accusation to be IGNORED by a Common Law Grand Jury anywhere in this country for any reason?

Monday, February 22, 2016

Censorship in America Today by Rich Scheben


Hi Paul,

This letter, as per your request, is a follow up to the conversation we had over the phone today. The subject matter is regarding the CENSORSHIP that is occurring in America today.

First of all, as you know that my book: “One New York Man’s Journey to Off Grid Living in Montana” has had steady sales and marketing throughout the country and even the world. ( I have even found out that all the public libraries in New Zealand had this book in stock). I’ve been invited to speak at many venues, been on hundreds of radio/TV shows and have created a DVD/video on off grid living.

Apparently, the “powers that be” are not approving the messages in the book and are doing everything possible to curb its sales. Over the past two and a half years since the book has been on the market Amazon has been up to some dirty tricks. They have said the book was “out of stock” (which is impossible for a POD book), misspelled the title (in order to misdirect search engines) and DELETED, at least dozens of five star reviews. ( I have actually seen them deleted while on line).

But now, things have gotten even more corrupt! I had a “representative” from Amazon call me at home telling me that Amazon is doing everything they can to eliminate future sales of my book. He said he was doing this “off record”, outside of the Amazon call center, because he and others really liked my book but can’t mention this on the job. ( He even verified some of my numbers referencing a private information report). I’ve called Amazon and Lightning Source (my Paid-on-Demand) company to get some answers. After a couple of weeks and experiencing a “passing the buck” syndrome, with no responses, I decided to write this short letter.

Please inform the people of our country that fascism and totalitarian dictatorships are now fully operational.

How long do we expect to live in the land of the free and the home of the brave if we don’t have the guts to stand for principle? I define principle as the right to demand that everyone on American soil live by the same rules, laws and accountability.


Rich Scheben

Sunday, February 21, 2016

Solid Resources and Brief Explanations from Anna Von Reitz

by Anna Von Reitz

I have been asked (indeed, hounded) by people desperately searching for reliable guides to inform their actions in favor of restoring the land-based and lawful government we are all owed. 

This in turn requires some basic understandings, and rather than explain this to each of 390 million people, please read, post, and pass this on. 

All forms of law except Natural Law (Law of Gravity, Law of Heredity, etc.) come from religion. This is because our religion establishes what we consider "right" and "wrong" and that in turn establishes our Law. 

My Reply to John Daresh and NLA --- Round One

by Anna Von Reitz

And the following is my response to "NLA" ---or rather, to John Daresh, who finally, after months of silence, decided to say SOMETHING to me..... His comments are clearly indicated, followed by mine:
The following is a response to the “Me and the NLA by Anna Von Reitz” posted at on February 16, 2016. I will not reprint the post, readers can go to the posted page and read for themselves the claims. I will respond to each assault by bullet points. If you want to understand Anna Von Reitz’s unique perspective, and why NLA distanced itself from her ideologies, please read the additional postings on her site;,
Anna has never contacted me or any of the National Leadership on the phone. Therefore, no such opportunity to hang up on her was afforded. Although we have need to chastise a national NLA leader from time to time for rudeness, it has over time become extremely rare. All of NLA leadership is instructed to be polite and, cordial and although NLA holds to the commandment of repentance and forgiveness[5], if one of our leaders are unable to control themselves we will rank them down, and out of the public eye, that’s our policy.
ANNA: I have called the National Headquarters and talked with people at least twice, including Gary Jolly. I believe I have the phone records to prove it. I definitely have the mailing receipts of contacts I have made, including the mailing that delivered the wet-ink, hand-signed, thumb-printed, and sealed affidavit of probable cause which has since been published as "You Know Something Is Wrong When.....An American Affidavit of Probable Cause" available to all on Amazon. com. Those who have read this affidavit will agree that it has been mammothly researched and honestly attested to, and I trust that I am not alone in being mystified as to why any American Common Law Grand Jury would FAIL to investigate a properly executed affidavit of probable cause alleging grand felony fraud, press-ganging, kidnapping, inland piracy and other crimes against the American people and our lawful government.

Know Anyone in Canada Doing Anna's Work?

by Anna Von Reitz

From Mark Hermary
Hi Paul,

Thank you so much for your efforts and energy being put into the exact
place it needs to be, I send massive gratitude to you and yours. Much
Gratitude of course goes to Anna as well!

I've read a bunch of yours and Anna's site and am
absolutely floored at the research and honesty. I also just received her
book "You Know Something..." and have learned more from the first 53 pages
than I did in 10 years of schooling!

As I am Canadian, I know the information is very close in many aspects,
but I was wondering if you knew someone in Canada doing Anna's work? I
have found Eternally Aware on youtube, and he is amazing and helping our
consciousness rise to truth as well, but I always look for more data to
fill in the blanks.

Anyone come to mind?

Might Anna know?

I just subscribed to your blog, so thank you for all I can research there,
and thank you in advance for all further research coming via your efforts.

With much Love,

Mark Hermary
A living man in Canada searching for the answers

Anna answers:

Global Currency Reset? Hello? This Isn't a "Reset".

by Anna Von Reitz

People have been anxiously milling around asking me to use my crystal ball.  What insights I have are strictly the common sense and practical kind that result from looking at past history and interpreting the present chaos in terms of what are the likely motivations of the moving parties? 

There are two groups.  The group I am aligned with wants to see the prosecution of the banks and lawyers and politicians responsible for this mess.  We want the criminals recognized as criminals and we want their crimes treated as crimes, similar to what Iceland has already done. 

This seems to be a far more practical and just response than allowing the perpetrators to start World War III, kill off their Priority Creditors, and collect on the life insurance policies they have placed on each one of us, naming their own corporations as the beneficiaries. 

Has everyone got the picture now?  We are dealing with self-serving criminals.

Monday, February 15, 2016

Letter of Support for Sheriff Palmer, Grant County, Oregon

by Anna Von Reitz

Sheriff Palmer and Sheriff Clarke in Oregon have both realized that the "Federal Government" corporation and its for-hire agencies have usurped unlawful jurisdiction, but they may still not realize exactly how or why, so I wrote the following Letter of Support to Sheriff Palmer to make it absolutely clear:

February 15, 2016
Sheriff Glenn E. Palmer
Grant County Sheriff’s Office
205 South Humbolt
Canyon City, Oregon RFD 97820

Dear Sheriff Palmer,
I want to thank and congratulate you on your strong stand in behalf of The Constitution and for honoring the guarantees that both the States of America and the living people are owed.
Although you are currently employed by a “governmental services corporation” that forces you to spend your time and effort on corporate law enforcement activities---- enforcement of “Public Policies” and “code” and “statutory law” and “regulations” instead of enforcing the Organic and Public Law we are all owed---- Sheriff Richard Mack brought this very issue all the way to the US Supreme Court in Mack and Prinz v. USA and it was determined that you have every right to exercise your office in defense of The Constitution.
If anyone tries to intimidate you or tell you that you can’t enforce the Organic Law of this country, you just waive that under their noses.
That said, it must be clearly stated that as things now stand, you are not occupying any Public Office.

Me and the NLA by Anna Von Reitz

About me and the NLA:  
I TRIED to work with NLA early on.  I also in good faith delivered a wet-ink signed and thumb-printed and sealed copy of our affidavit of probable cause to John Daresh, but nothing was done about our affidavit---which has been published as "You Know Something Is Wrong When....An American Affidavit of Probable Cause" available on

When I attempted to contact NLA regarding their silence and inaction with regard to the grave accusations of criminality our affidavit raised, they hung up on me.  A couple weeks later, Mr. Gary Jolly, contacted me and said something inane like, "we know who you are and we don't trust you"--- as if this was an excuse for failure to address capital crime?

I also rubbed them the wrong way when I revealed that the Common Law Grand Jury is only about one-fourth of the Common Law Court System we are owed, and without the Common Law Judges (properly called Common Law Justices) and Trial Juries and Clerks and other members of the Common Law Courts including the Sheriffs operating the land jurisdiction of this country, the Common Law Grand Juries have no enforcement capability.  They can hand down their findings, and the "District Attorney" can ignore them, so that the entire effort goes astray and has no teeth. 

Therefore I pointed out the need to elect people to fill the other, additional vacated Public Offices we are owed and to re-established the American Common Law Court System that is supposed to be in place and acting in support of the Common Law Grand Juries.  Mr. Daresh and Mr. Jolly would hear none of it.

Three years have gone by with the Citizens Common Law Grand Juries being set up and spinning their wheels, accomplishing nothing much for all their work and good will.  Meanwhile, those who waved good-bye to NLA and proceeded to set up their counties on the land and elect and fill the vacated Public Offices have made great strides. They are actively setting up and restoring County-level government and educating people all over this country, while NLA continues to accomplish.......what?

Sunday, February 14, 2016

Answer to Ralph Kermit Winterrowd and Anyone Else Who THINKS I Am Not a Judge:

by Anna Von Reitz

Below you will find (to use his word) "bullshit" that Ralph Kermit Winterrowd and certain others have been spreading around the internet and my answer to this post below and other accusations that I have been involved in shootings and murders is posted immediately below.  I have had about enough "bullshit" from ALL SOURCES thereof, have filed my teeth, and am ready when they are:

Ralph Kermit Winterrowd wrote:

Enough of this Patriot BS Nonsense that is floating on posts all over the Internet as is Anna Von Reitz [Judge]  is TOTAL FRAUD folks; and she is NO JUDGE; and, she sure isn’t a Constitutional Judge arising under the constitution of any the several States of the Union in Alaska.  Here are just some of the documents (facts) from the crooks in Alaska.  I have researched this out in great depth.  This is just the tip of the iceberg in this Post.  The Alaska Judicial Counsel has been given these documents and more; and, they find no “ethical” errors or problems.  Ask Lucifer if his demons are bad and what do you expect.  I will be taking them on but there is just one of me.  I have all of the research done that is required to take them to federal court for quo warranto or whatever.  Alaska Courts are a TOTAL waste of you time.

There are NO constitutional JUDGES/JUSTICES in Alaska or any Court arising under the constitution of any of the several States in Alaska.  There are no Civil Commissions issued to appoint judges or Justices to a “public Officer” signed by the Governor of Alaska.  (A real Civil Commission attached that we found that they overlooked in purging the archives).  This is mandated by the Constitution of the STATE OF Alaska (should be “Constitution of Alaska”) Article IV Section 5 [ I have all of the constitution of the several States up though 1878 - government book but requires Skype as the files are too large for e-mail] and AS 39.05.035. (Both included) There are no “Oaths of office as a public officer,” (Module attached on what it takes to be a “public officer”) as I have all of the oaths of the current folks called appointment letters ONLY and some are not even signed or even have letterheads.  The Alaska Bar Association  by a BAR RULE changed the name of the courts in 1974, changed the venue and changed the seals of the courts.  They had the legislature  repeal the Seal of the "Superior Court of Alaska” in the “Third District" of which the Anchorage Court still has it in the drawer of the HEAD Clerk’s Office.” (included)  Now the Court is called “In the Superior Court FOR the State of Alaska” using the “Trial Courts of Alaska” Seal with the “Third Judicial District" and the venue changed by the Ak Bar Assoc. from “Third District” in the statue to “Third Judicial District” and on and on.  These Courts of Alaska are only private Courts presided over by a mere Alaska Bar Member with ye ole black robe.  Enjoy, as I sure have.  I have put Judge Wolf under citizens arrest in open court for DL issue of trying to help Chickaloon Natives.  Pissed ye ole sob off and I was sentenced to 6 months jail (suspended 5 months), fined $5,000 (suspended $4,000) and 5 years probation.  They don’t even do this for DUI folks but I really pissed him and his cohorts off.  I will not bow to any of them - ever.  I never STAND and they don’t even attempt to address that as I can shove it right up their tush in a about 2 minutes tops in open court.
Lesson Learned - never attempt to help those that will not fight for their own freedom and liberty.  It was a federal sting and I bit, but Chickaloon got MORE Grants and the sobs even told me so.

In Dave Gladden’s case on this Fee Simple Absolute Title filed in the public record, Superior Court Judge White (sic) states  in an ORDER signed by her that she is merely an “Unsigned Jurist.” She was being challenged to recuse herself as   she was NOT a bona fide “public Officer” as there was No “Oath of Office as a Public Officer” on file of any judges or justices, no “Civil Commission” on file (Alaska states in a letter attached) as they don’t even use them any more in violation of  AS 39.05.035 (included) and Article IV Section 5  (included)  but they  do have “Employee Affidavit” - a flunky.  She signs documents at the bottom and has a law degree as a “undersigned jurist”  ( Order included).  Whoo-Haa!
The Appointment letter are “accepting” the appointment not the Appointment by a Governor Of Alaska by a valid Civil Commission (included) - found one that the didn’t Purge.  The sign “employee affidavits’ and get the 41 words correct but the  “Oaths” for “Public Officer" are all incorrect as they are RUSE.  They usually state “Constitution of the United States of America” versus the “Constitution of the United States’ and other irregularities. 
FORGET this Anna Von Reitz as she is fraud wasting valuable time that could used to learn the truth on issues.

And here below is my answer about Ralph and the office I occupy and the situation in general:

Friday, February 12, 2016

An example of how the people are NOT buying the story line against the Bundy and Hammond actions.

One of our subscribers sent a link to this article about how "Law" is misapplied completely in the Bundy and Hammond cases.

The people who are really thinking about this, are NOT buying the story line of the feds.

“That this Assembly doth explicitly and peremptorily declare, that it views the powers of the federal government, as resulting from the compact, to which the states are parties; as limited by the plain sense and intention of the instrument constituting the compact; as no further valid that they are authorized by the grants enumerated in that compact; and that in case of a deliberate, palpable, and dangerous exercise of other powers, not granted by the said compact, the states who are parties thereto, have the right, and are in duty bound, to interpose for arresting the progress of the evil, and for maintaining within their respective limits, the authorities, rights and liberties appertaining to them.” (emphasis added) Kentucky Resolution of 1798, author, Thomas Jefferson

Thursday, February 11, 2016

The actual complaint against Cliven Bundy.

There are so many holes, lies, and falsifications of history in this document that it appears to me to be one of the most evil documents I have ever seen.
Just my opinion of course. Make up your own mind.

The Need to Dismantle the Machine

by Anna Von Reitz

Most Beloved Francis, 

I ran across this quote tonight and thought of you:

Isabel Patterson in her book, The God of the Machine: "…What good does it do to have a saint of every conceivable virtue operating a guillotine? Personally, the man may be above reproach. He may have the highest of morals and ethics. He may be imbued with a passion for doing good. But the mechanism he is hired to operate cuts off heads. He may dislike to cut off heads. He may weep with true sorrow whenever a head falls into the basket. But he was hired to pull the rope that lets the knife drop. And when it comes down, off comes the head. That is the way the tool works."

My discussion with Archbishop George was much to this point.  If we allow criminals--- acting as bankers and lawyers----to undermine a people's lawful government and thereby convert its purpose to evil ends, it doesn't matter how the people vote or who occupies a political office. The result of running a guillotine is always the same. 

Wednesday, February 10, 2016

Update from Judge Anna -- February 10, 2016

Well, Let's See.....
What has Judge Anna been up to the last few days?
Besides lecturing, teaching, writing institutional framework documents, analyzing new forms of currency and barter platforms, reforming the Federal Postal District Courts, preparing the international criminal complaints against the FBI in the wrongful death of LaVoy Finicum, negotiating with leaders of the Bar Associations for stand-downs and cooperation with prosecution of those responsible for the false claims that have been made against American assets, collection of American assets that have been purloined, placement of international liens, collection of international liens, setting up informational resources for peacekeeping and law enforcement officers, setting up more informational resources for local organizers to restore their local county and state governments owed to the land jurisdiction of this country, exposure of commercial mercenary armies operating on our soil under color of law disguised as trademarked government agencies--FBI, BLM, and so on, that have been acquired by buy-outs and mergers of older governmental services organizations, assisting in the release of Americans detained in federal prisons, demanding correction of political status and the establishment of orderly protocols and agreed upon procedures to accomplish this without further delay or obfuscation, the end of "14th Amendment" citizenship presumptions, repudiation of the the so-called "National Debt" and so much, much more..... not much.
I must plead with everyone again, please, please, please DO NOT send me your individual cases. I can't possibly reply and when I do pile through my huge pile of daily mail, it is heart-breaking for me to hear your pleas and know that for the most part, I can't answer because (1) my jurisdiction is limited by geography and (2) there simply is not time. I am only one old lady and I HAVE TO keep my attention focused on the Big Picture of ending these evils once and for all for everyone, not just a few. Those who have gone through the court process of just minor cases know how time and energy consuming these are and also know that there are millions of Americans in the same boat.

Monday, February 8, 2016

Record traffic for Anna's website and my blog

With page loads approaching 20,000 hits, and first time visits almost 11 thousand liftoff of this rocket has now been achieved.  These are stats for just one week, and the blog is doing well also.
Combine the two and it gets interesting real fast.

Weekly Stats Report: 1 Feb - 7 Feb 2016

Mon Tues Wed Thur Fri Sat Sun Total Avg
Pageloads 2,663 2,307 3,351 2,882 2,934 2,402 2,149 18,688 2,670
Unique Visits 2,293 1,940 2,787 2,405 2,517 2,110 1,864 15,916 2,274
First Time Visits 1,541 1,201 1,862 1,634 1,804 1,529 1,276 10,847 1,550
Returning Visits 752 739 925 771 713 581 588 5,069 724

These are the stats for the blog.

Weekly Stats Report: 1 Feb - 7 Feb 2016
Project: Paul Stramer Blog


Mon Tues Wed Thur Fri Sat Sun Total Avg
Pageloads 1,400 1,456 1,535 1,319 1,101 1,653 1,300 9,764 1,395
Unique Visits 913 1,065 1,101 874 720 1,167 977 6,817 974
First Time Visits 588 773 739 563 473 829 674 4,639 663
Returning Visits 325 292 362 311 247 338 303 2,178 311

Sunday, February 7, 2016

Where do we find the 'United States' government? What is it?

"The United States is located in the District of Columbia." - California Commercial Code 9307 h)
“The United States Government is a foreign corporation with respect to a state.” Volume 20: Corpus Juris Secundum, (P 1785: NY re: Merriam 36 N.E. 505 1441 S.Ct. 1973, 41 L. Ed. 287)
And we have this decision – one of many – that makes US jurisdiction clear:
“The laws of Congress in respect to those matters do not extend into the territorial limits of the states, but have force only in the District of Columbia , and other places that are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the national government.” Catha v United States , 152 US , at 215
U.S. Code, Title 28 – JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE, (Chapter 176) Section 3002 (15) (a, b, & c); ~
(15) ” United States ” means – (A) a Federal corporation; (B) an agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the United States; (C) an instrumentality of the United States
"The IRS is not a U.S. Government Agency. It is an Agency of the IMF." (Diversified Metal Products v. IRS et al. CV-93-405E-EJE U.S.D.C.D.I., Public Law 94-564, Senate Report 94-1148 pg. 5967, Reorganization Plan No. 26, Public Law 102-391.)
The IMF is an Agency of the UN. (Blacks Law Dictionary 6th Ed. Pg. 816)
The U.S. has not had a Treasury since 1921. (41 Stat. Ch.214 pg. 654)
The U.S. Treasury is now the IMF. (Presidential Documents Volume 29-No.4 pg. 113, 22 U.S.C. 285-288)
The FCC, CIA, FBI, NASA and all of the other alphabet gangs were never part of the United States government, even though the "US Government" held shares of stock in the various Agencies. (U.S. V. Strang, 254 US 491, Lewis v. US, 680 F.2d, 1239)

Saturday, February 6, 2016

Nepotism and corruption in the Hammond case? Can Anybody refute this?

Subject: Fw: this is how it works...
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 03:26:59 +0000
These articles both appeared on the Shasta Lantern website.

 This is the way government operates. They can't make it on merit of a case or law, so they have to rig the deal. Just like the ambush. Have Obama state that he is sending in his best crisis negotiator and then he laughs as they carry out the ambush and commit murder. That is how he negotiates. Now all they have to do is alter all the evidence, that they control, to fit the script that they released to the media.

 Power Corrupts Absolutely: Ties that Bind Run Deep with Aiken Family in Hammond Case

 by Red Smith · January 26, 2016

 Ann Aiken, Chief Judge of the United States District Court of Oregon 9th Circuit, is no stranger to accusations of inappropriate relationships regarding her Courtroom. She is not a stranger to willfully failing to disclose those relationships and has even allegedly illegally ruled in her own favor to attempt to hide those relationships. In one recent complaint filing, a visiting out-of-circuit judge was requested by motion because the Defendants, including Ninth Circuit judges who are a member of the Oregon State Bar, had several political, business and social ties to Judge Aiken who was to be the presiding judge in the case. These ties constituted a very real potential conflict of interest against the Plaintiff’s interests. There are specific guidelines to be followed when requesting inter-circuit visiting judges and Judge Aiken refused to follow those requirements. Only the Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court may decide such matters and Judge Aiken refused to follow those guidelines and the federal statute by ruling on these matters herself. Judge Aiken ruled on the motion against her in her own favor. Already brought to light is Judge Aiken’s potential inappropriate working relationship with Hammond terrorism re-sentencing lead prosecutor Amanda Marshall. Prior to being appointed U.S. District Attorney Amanda Marshall worked for the Oregon Department of Justice in Child Advocacy Services, a State Agency overseen by the Child Advocacy Services Board, a Board Judge Aiken has been President of since 1998. Judge Aiken was the Chief Justice that oversaw Amanda Marshall’s Oath of Office and swearing in and in conclusion to that ceremony instructed Marshall to “now hit the ground running”.
Judge Aiken was also the presiding Judge in a 2006 case

FBI and Oregon Police Killed a Political Dissident - by Tim Baldwin

Tim Baldwin is a son of Chuck Baldwin, and I know him personally. We don't always agree, but this time I think he got it right BIG TIME.

As an introduction to my thoughts on Lavoy Finnicum's killing in Burns, Oregon, consider my article published in the Flathead Beacon's Two For Thought weekly Opinion section:

The FBI and Oregon police killed a rancher, Lavoy Finicum, last week. Lavoy joined Ammon Bundy, among others, for three weeks in occupying a refuge on public lands in Burns. Like many Americans, the occupiers believed BLM had been long abusing power. Police released one video of the incident (but not other pertinent surveillance). Was this killing lawful? 

Under the Fourth Amendment, police who use deadly force have a burden to prove their actions were objectively reasonable in light of the facts and circumstances confronting them based on the totality of the circumstances.

Regardless of  one’s view of the occupation, the video raises issues regarding police’ actions: (1) Why block the highway in nowhere-ville? (2) Why use snipers and a dozen-plus officers? (3) Why not use spike strips to stop him? (4) When exactly was Lavoy likely to harm police?—when shot, Lavoy was facing no police, could barely walk in deep snow and held no gun. (5) Lavoy had not just committed a dangerous felony and fleeing therefrom. (6) Police had prior opportunities to serve an arrest warrant in a safe manner. (7) Why immediately rush Lavoy and spark conflict rather than contain the area and determine his actions?

The occupiers did not convince the greater part of society to aid them, given their seeming “state of war” approach. Still, if our laws can condemn Lavoy, they can also condemn police.

In fairness, there are some who are not normally forgiving to government abuse but believe police were justified in killing Lavoy: one such notable viewpoint on this incident is my dad, Chuck BaldwinI, on the other hand, believe the video suggests that police were not justified in killing Lavoy when they did--even assuming he had a pistol inside his jacket and was reaching for it.

Read the rest on Tim's website here:

Are You Aware - This is crucial for Ammon Bundy

This letter was sent late this afternoon to Ammon Bundy's attorney.  I believe Mike Arnold is a well-intentioned man, but like most American Lawyers, he probably hasn't ever been taught these facts.  So I told him and left the door open for him to ask more and to do the right thing in securing the release of all those who were attacked by the FBI  in Oregon for lack of jurisdiction.

To Mike at the Arnold Lawfirm

From Judge Anna Maria Riezinger,

Most lawyers trained in American law schools in the past fifty years have NOT been trained about land jurisdiction, nor have they been properly trained about the jurisdiction of the air, either.  

But prior to that time, those who are now late 70's, 80's, and 90's knew the Federal System and knew it well. 

Ammon Bundy is being mischaracterized as a "Domestic Terrorist"--- "Domestic" that is, with respect to the Federal United States, but he is not now and never was a Federal United States Citizen.  He is a native of the Continental United States. The false presumption otherwise was created by fraud against him and his parents when he was just a baby to enrich the British Crown Corporation and pump up the war effort during WWII. After WWII they just continued press-ganging Americans into the foreign international jurisdiction of the sea.  That fraud is about to come down on top of the perpetrators 

You would do well to avoid any implication in their misdeeds.

Ammon Bundy has never knowingly or willingly operated as a "person" in his life.  He has never operated a merchant marine vessel in any capacity whatsoever. He never knowingly volunteered to be a franchisee or sought any benefit of incorporation. Any action taken against him on the basis of these absurd and self-interested presumptions is an act of personage and those bringing these charges against him are actively involved----whether they know it or not--- in barratry.

He is a plain old American Rancher and his Constitutional guarantees are being violated.  Now that you know these facts it is up to you to bring it to the attention of your brethren in the court and to stop this travesty in its tracks.

As you will see if you look at Amendment VII of the Constitution of the United States (which says verbatim the same as the actual Constitution through Amendment 12) you will see that living people are owed Common Law and Ammon Bundy is owed Common Law and a trial by jury of his peers--- meaning men and women like him who are aware of their guarantees and their position as "free sovereign and independent people of the United States" ---- not British Subject "inhabitants" here to provide essential governmental services.  

Ammon and his co-defendants are not subject to the jurisdiction of the sea nor to any "Special Admiralty" court venue.  They are non-Domestic, non-resident aliens with respect to you and your entire Court System and you have been duly advised. We require actual justice, not just an appearance thereof.

You've agreed to be his attorney, but you can't be his attorney because you are a Bar Member. At best you can be a faithful Counselor, but I doubt that the Court will pay your share of the performance bonds if you do.  

I know you don't want to hear this, but it is true. Your United States Grand Jury is welcome to bring an indictment against the Bundy family and our Federal Grand Jury is welcome to bring an indictment against all the foreign agents masquerading as "FBI" and "BLM" and also against those members of the "US District" Court System who are pretending to be operating within their charter. 

I will leave it to you to figure out whether the tail really wags the dog or not.  We are here to answer any questions you might have.

Judge Anna Maria Riezinger


See this article and over 100 others on Anna's website

Friday, February 5, 2016

For all of you who do not know who the BLM is.

This was received by email from a trusted friend, who copied it from facebook, but I couldn't find the original article therefore don't know who the author is.
UPDATE:   It appears the author is Eric Bell, who shared it with a video on the Bundy facebook page.

Who is the BLM?

For all of you who do not know who the BLM is.
The Bureau of Land Management is assumed falsely to be an actual de jure lawful agency of a lawful constitutional governing body.
The BLM is in fact, a de facto fraudulent usurper and not in any way a lawful Constitutionally recognized agency of the Constitutional Republic.

BLM is actually a sub-corporation of UNITED STATES INCORPORATED, a private foreign owned off-shore corporation since its last incorporation in 1925, copyrighted, trademarked and registered in Puerto Rico.

Wednesday, February 3, 2016

More Bull From Karen Hudes --- Round Eight

by Anna Von Reitz
My answers to Karen's assertions are in different type and labeled.
Vatican agents dropping like flies:
Global Debt Facility
From: Karen Hudes
Date: Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 8:10 AM
Subject: Re: important
Dear anonymous writer,
You are right that either Von Reitz or I am lying. Von Reitz is not a judge.

Who is Karen Hudes to say that I am not a judge? Last time I looked, it was up to Americans to select their judges, not people like Karen Hudes, who are working as undeclared Foreign Agents on American soil and operating private courts under color of law as public courts. FACT: I am the Worst Nightmare of all Bar Association Members---- a Common Law Judge operating the land jurisdiction of the United States. FACT: Amendment VII clearly gives me---not them---jurisdiction over all matters affecting living people and their property. FACT: Milligan Ex Parte, provides that where I hold court they have to shut down their "prize courts" and stop plundering the people, which means that they aren't going to be able to seize upon our assets under color of law anymore. That's a big "Boo Hoo Hoo!" for people like Karen, but the FACT that I am a Judge and an American Common Law Judge is very good news for America and Americans and the sooner they all get busy and fill all the vacated public office judgeships, the better.

There IS No National Debt Owed by Americans

by Anna Von Reitz

The Federal Reserve Banks were participants in the Federal Reserve System so far as I know, even though they are each separate corporations apart from the old Federal Reserve System. Also as far as I know they all sprung up and began operating-- both the banks and the "System" -- as part of the schemes of the same actors at Jekyll Island-- the Federal Reserve System being orchestrated in cooperation with members of Congress by the same group of conspirators who organized the banks servicing the Federal Reserve System.
Since the Federal Reserve System acted as the mechanism for the fraud and the banks acted as administrative hubs and depositories for the Federal Reserve System I tend to see the banks as just as much a part of the problem as the systemic abuses -- please comment and correct if I am wrong and explain.

On Wednesday, February 3, 2016, Anna von Reitz  wrote:

There IS No "National Debt" Owed By Americans
I keep running into this idea that we have a huge nineteen trillion dollar debt to pay, and this is totally FALSE. The IMF doing business as the UNITED STATES, INC., a governmental services corporation in bankruptcy owes $19 trillion and has falsely named us as its "sureties"--- think co-signers -- for its debts. They've tried to swindle us the same way the Federal Reserve Banks swindled our parents and grandparents back in the 1930's.

Clarification -- What We Have Done from Anna Von Reitz

Clarification -- What We Have Done
I am not a legal counsel for the General (Dunford). We are all working on reclaiming American assets for Americans. For right now, it's improper to call what we are doing a "New Republic"--- that will require a public education process, each one making their political status (citizenship, etc.) choices, the election of Fiduciary Deputies from each State to attend a Continental Congress to either amend or abolish the existing actual Constitution.
For now, we have saved The Constitution for the united States of America. The rats sought to "vacate" the contract by entering the UNITED STATES, INC. into bankruptcy without naming a successor to contract. That left the "federal" side of the contract vacant and flapping in the wind. We formed an agreement with the American Native Nations -- the Athabasca and Lakota-- to fulfill the federal side. We issued two sets of Sovereign Letters Patent, one to reaffirm the united States of America, and one to establish a new arrangement with the Native people to bring them out of their POW status and incarceration in the Jurisdiction of the Sea and put them back on the land as free, sovereign, and independent people. We then sealed this arrangement with a Declaration of Joint Sovereignty, spelling out the intent of our actions. These actions were sent by Registered Mail to the Pope, the Queen, the UN Security Council, the United Nations Secretary General and others.
For the first time since the original Constitution was adopted, the federal side of the contract is now in the hands of Americans devoted to America--- not British (Federal Reserve) or French (IMF) interlopers. For the first time, the Federal Agents have a vested interest in truly and honestly protecting America and Americans, because if they hurt or plunder us, they hurt and plunder themselves.
And now we are all going after the assets that are owed to Americans which have been purloined by international banks and the "governmental services corporations" they have run as storefronts ---under conditions of gross fraud and deceit.
Please note there is no "statute of limitation" on the crime of fraud, much less malicious fraud tort claims.
See this article and over 100 others on Anna's website

Is America Under a Judgment?

by Anna Von Reitz

I have been asked in recent days by many earnest people if America is under a judgment and if we are condemned by Heaven. I want all the innocent victims of all this criminality and fraud to know that no, neither America nor Americans nor any other victims of crime are subject to any such judgment. Far from it. We are being upheld and guided and protected every step of the way.
The cause of the problem is a spiritual war--- the last gasp of Lucifer and his minions trying to resist their own inevitable defeat and still misleading men to follow them and their lies into one more blood-letting debacle. Consider it a final test, like Examination Day. Do you know the right answers yet?
If you don't there are plenty of politicians, bankers, and lawyers ready to lead you astray one more time, to try to cast off the blame for their sins on any scapegoat they can find.
Throughout our lives on Earth all the Children of God of every religion and faith are presented with two choices---- the Truth and the Lie.

Tuesday, February 2, 2016

Testimony of Shawna Cox about LaVoy Finicums shooting.

I have to warn you that this is gut wrenching.  It tells a different story than the official version.

Fired upon without provocation. Hundreds of shots. Vehicle shot many times. 

Monday, February 1, 2016

Best Open Carry stop EVER. Share with EVERY OFFICER YOU KNOW !

Published on Sep 20, 2013
Please write or call the Orion Township's Sheriffs Department if you think Deputy Paul Buhl is a hero to the Constitution!
2525 Joslyn Rd., Lake Orion, MI 48360

Protester on video ( Nick Somberg ) debates Anti open carry gun store owner on FOX 2 LIVE vs. Mainstream Media:

For-Liberty / "Freedom Fridays" Facebook page:

We saw the OC Sheriff car pull and took out our camera-phones right away, anticipating trouble. The officer gets out of his car, waves to us, and walks right over. He shakes all of our hands, introduces himself, and states his purpose for walking over to us.

He never asked us to disarm, never threatened us, never asked for our names or identification. I think I can speak for everyone in the group that it was an honor to meet this man. This is what we need to see from police officers everywhere!


For Arnie Rosner-- Reply to Suggestions

by Anna Von Reitz

1.    The organic Constitution is installed as the supreme law of the land.  
The Constitution, thank God, never left and doesn’t have to be “installed”—but it may (once we have educated ourselves sufficiently) need to be seriously corrected in some respects.  Term limits for Congress and no ability for Congress to exempt itself from the consequences of any action it takes and an end to Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17 all spring to mind. A complete reworking of the sections dealing with courts and the judiciary also. The Constitution is a marvelous thing, but it has been over 200 years and while many needs and issues remain the same, we don’t have to maintain a split jurisdiction allowing any foreign governments to meddle in our affairs. The time will come for a Continental Congress--- a real one, not a fake—that brings together Fiduciary Deputies from every state to take stock of where we are and where we want to be.
2.    It would seem that there should be some sort of NOTICE provided announcing the termination of all contracts and agreements with any current contractors/employees. 
Fortunately or unfortunately, none of these people are actually working for us, and even if we had the right to terminate employees of middlemen employers (which is arguable since we are ultimately the ones paying for all this “service”) – it would cause real panic and chaos because there is no other organized system in place yet.
3.    Some key issues with which we would consider dealing…
Washington, D.C. recognition revoked.  Start charging rent for space.
The discussion so far is to absorb DC back into the states that contributed to it to begin with and ensure that it is no longer operated as a separate Congressional oligarchy.
4.    Congress dissolved.