By Anna Von Reitz
Over the years, the British Territorial United States Government and its U.S. Citizens have fallen into the mistaken belief that the Municipal Government and its "independent, international city-state" created by the City Government of Washington, DC, is "their" lawful civilian government --- when in fact, there is no lawful civilian government present in Washington, DC, and never has been. By definition.
It's the "never has been" part that stymies the Fed Folk.
The lawful government has always been seated in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, not Washington, DC.
All Federal Functions ever designated and granted as delegated powers to any and all Federal Subcontractors are limited to international subject matter.
This is why we have a national capitol -- Philadelphia, and a "Federal Capitol" --- Washington, DC. Both.
The Federales operate exclusively as "persons" of one kind or another, and always operate in the realms of the dead.
They have no power to represent the living people or Lawful Persons of this country, simply because no national level powers were ever granted to the Federal Government.
They tried to do an end run around this by using the plenary powers granted Congress over the City of Washington, DC, to create the Municipality of Washington, DC and make it an independent, international city-state, but that is all bungled up for numerous reasons--- not the least of which is that those plenary powers were granted to the Federal Congress, not the Territorial Congress. Plus:
1. There is and was already a serving, built-in national-level government in this country that has to be presumed to be the intended civilian government owed duty and allegiance;
2. The Municipal city-state is still situated within the District of Columbia and has no direct connection to the American Government;
3. Any laws, codes, or mandates or public policies issued by the Municipal Government can only impact Municipal citizens of the United States;
4. The Territorial Government already declared the "citizens of the United States" to be criminals and criminals to be slaves under their Fourteenth Amendment;
5. How then, are their slaves made into the civilian government they purportedly work for and take their orders from?
No, once again, a bridge too far, and the logistics don't fit.
The British Territorial Government was not the intended recipient of the plenary powers granted to Congress as the government of the City of Washington, DC. That was a duty of the American Federal Congress.
In the absence of the Federal Congress those duties revert back to the Federation of States, not a successorship for the British Territorial Congress.
So the entire basis for the creation of the Municipal city-state is flawed, and the Brits can hardly have it both ways --- creating and then misidentifying the Municipal city-state as the "civilian government" they are obligated to serve with one breath, and then also defining the Municipal citizens of the United States to be criminals and slaves under obligation to them with their next inhale.
All this is impossibly contrived and does not succeed against the observable fact that the American people (acting as "People" --- State Citizens) created the whole framework and were referring to themselves as the civilian population. Theirs was the only civilian population that existed in context in 1787 or 1789.
This crazy set-up would have the British Territorial Federal Employees taking their orders from people they have enslaved.
However convenient that would be, considering the 60-40% split on profits and assets already in place between the Popes and British Monarchs, it fails the test of logic and timelines.
The Constitutions and Treaties cannot be referencing a civilian population that did not exist for a hundred years after the adoption of these agreements.
The "Constitution" of the defunct Scottish commercial corporation doing business as "The United States of America" -- Incorporated, cannot be amended a hundred years and more after it went bankrupt.
The British Territorial Congress was never granted the plenary powers over Washington, DC., and so, couldn't "vote itself out of position" to use those plenary powers to create an independent, international city-state -- Municipality of Washington, DC -- to serve as "a" civilian government for them.
All these factors are locked in.
They all preclude: (1) the legitimate existence of any Municipal city-state; (2) any possibility that the Municipal city-state could contain the civilian population owed the duty of the British Territorial U.S. Citizens; (3) that the "citizens of the United States" can be both the slaves and the masters of the U.S. Citizens.
The result is that the British Territorial United States Government is willfully not recognizing the civilian population they actually owe their good faith service to, and the "interpretation" of their contract that they have tried to contrive doesn't work.
They, the existing Federales, have no lawful government to reference as a result, but in fact, they owe their allegiance to numerous lawful governments and especially to the States of the Union, which hold the service contract with them, the Federal entities, in international jurisdiction and also with the Union States in national jurisdiction.
This is why we present our lawful unincorporated instrumentality, The United States of America, as the agreed upon agent of the unincorporated sovereign nation-states in international jurisdictions.
And this is also why the American Native Nations have a legitimate lawful government and can form an American Republic --- something that Federal citizens can never do.
Notice to Principals is Notice to Agents; Notice to Agents is Notice to Principals.
Issued by:
Anna Maria Riezinger -- Fiduciary
The United States of America
In care of: Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 99652
November 15th 2025
------------------
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.