By Anna Von Reitz
The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 says it will back each Federal Reserve Note in circulation with forty cents of gold.
They don’t do this.
The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 says that bankers are to be held personally responsible if they fail.
They are not.
The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 says if a Fed bank is insolvent, it is to become the property of the US.
It doesn’t.
The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 says that insolvent Fed banks shall forfeit their shares in their Regional Fed.
They don’t.
The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 says that it will use its profits to supplement the gold reserve and pay down any US debt.
It definitely doesn’t do this. lol
The Federal Reserve has 3 mandates —people now only talk about the dual mandates, which are stable prices and low unemployment—the third mandate is to keep long term interest rates constant.
They don’t do this.
The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 says that the Fed will maintain parity of all forms of legal money issued by the US and strengthen the gold reserve.
They don’t do this.
The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 says the Fed Board will audit Fed banks at will.
They don’t do this.
The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 says its by-laws are not to violate US law.
They do.
The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 says that Fed banks cannot discount stocks or commercial paper.
They do.
The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 says each Fed bank will maintain a surplus fund from its profits, up to 40% of its paid-in capital stock.
They don’t do this.
The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 says the Fed Board will supervise Fed banks.
They don’t.
The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 says Fed banks will publish complete details weekly of their assets and liabilities, as well as the nature of their transactions.
They don’t do this.
The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 says the Fed is required to write off worthless assets on its books.
It doesn’t do this.
The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 says it is to have reserves in gold equal to 35% of its deposits.
It doesn’t do this.
The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 says it will maintain a gold account at the Treasury.
It doesn’t do this.
The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 says the Fed’s franchise will be forfeited if they violate law.
It is not.
The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 says that Federal Reserve Notes will be redeemed for gold.
They’re not.
The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 says Fed bank owners will be held responsible for all Fed bank debts and contracts.
They aren’t.
The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 says US Treasury yields are to be paid in tax-free gold.
They aren’t.
Gold is mentioned 53 times and on 11/25 pages.
The word gold is littered throughout the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, basing one promise after another on GOLD.
It was the ONLY reason the legislation passed.
The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 says the Federal Reserve will not pay any income tax, its shareholders will receive a 6% dividend or the yield on a US 10-year treasury (whichever is lower) and also to have all their expenses paid.
They did manage to uphold these parts of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913.
Why do we have a Federal Reserve again?
That is the second time that Anna cites "Section 15" of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 as the portion where the "remedy" is found.
ReplyDeleteThe "remedy" is written in Section 16, Paragraph 1, which is now codified at Title 12 U.S.C. §411:
https://www.federalreserve.gov/aboutthefed/section16.htm#:~:text=The%20Board%20of%20Governors%20of%20the%20Federal%20Reserve%20System%20shall,the%20Board%20of%20Governors%20of
Seems like one well versed in these topics would know that and catch the mistake the second time.
Either way, it is correct to state that without full disclosure and real access to the required "remedy" from this undue burden, real remedy does not exist, which renders any claim by those attempting to enforce any laws/rules/obligations under the "Federal Reserve Act" upon the living people null and void due to bad faith, deceit and obstruction - among other reasons.
Proper notice, and forming the lawful record of your intent and will, stands as undeniable evidence in any court. However, without true and lawful American common law courts in operation, and without the proper and required enforcement of judgments rendered in said courts, the American people are without the ability to realize justice and remedy.
However, the proper lawful record you form still stands as true and no one can claim otherwise regardless of the unlawful, illegal and immoral actions of others and the actual results/consequences that may occur.
Final Judgment and Justice is the purview of Almighty God and our role is to hear the words, "Well done, good and faithful servant!"
https://archive.org/details/indexdigestfede00statgoog/page/30/mode/2up
DeleteSee Page 30 for the original language and text mentioning redemption in gold rather than "lawful money".
yes, under threat and coersion they confiscated actual, physical matter from our mothers and fathers: GOLD, that represented the fruit of their labor amongst each other.
Deletea723am
Deletei:woman make (my) court record before God and man as i:woman go.
[common law]
Hello
ReplyDeleteCorrect me if I am wrong but if a house tenant decides to take the property and place it within the international trade bank can the usurping lawyers take control in that fraudulent court system? Also what is the name and address of a international trade bank? Can sum1 assist with a answer here?
By: J, wanting to know.
Anna you missed a few target location's The Vatican ,Davos ,Basel (BIS) Swiss .
ReplyDeleteDoes anyone know where to locate the Records for The Bankruptcy Act?
ReplyDeletecongressional record?
Deletethat’s-interesting, dear
ReplyDeleteAnna has thousands of articles walking us through these very processes. Stop complaining everybody, do some research, get off your butts and find a way to be constructive in your own neighborhoods. Check out "the working group" channel on bitchute, for deep dive instructions on how to get remedy. Oh, and yeah, it's gonna require some work. So buckle up buttercup, and do something about it!
ReplyDeleteButter up.
Delete