Monday, September 6, 2021

New Free Silver Every Month Promotion from Mint Builder

 https://mintbuilder.com/296110


12 comments:

  1. must be really afraid to let people talk now!!?? new articles comment sections CLOSED! :):):)

    ReplyDelete
  2. hey!! that means YOU!!?
    :# maskit!
    AND THATS AN IRDER!!

    ReplyDelete
  3. compliments of:
    your free and open bananna society :):) lololololoooolllooollllloll!

    ReplyDelete
  4. NO TALKZOOP FOR *YOU*!!?

    AND NO VOTING ON IT EITHER!!?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. i cant quit chuckling when i see the comments are closed on the new articles.
      what?:
      "listen to ME"! "YOU shut up!" "*I* will talk."!!?? :):)

      Delete
  5. the name of this comment system is like:reCAPTR.
    is that like re-capture?
    re-capture what? man? YOU?
    good on me that i dont have any intentional originating good faith agreement with any of these people!
    ever.
    and they are certainly not my employees.
    they owe me.
    they owe me and all is not only owed but also due and overdue.
    and i dont forgive them.
    and i dont forgive their debts.
    and i font forgive their trespasses.
    they are not forgiven by me and wont be.
    and so it is.

    janmariewoman

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. and speaking of not forgiving:

      if a man they named jesus hung on a "vav"/spike to pay for forgiveness by his father of a repentant mans trespasses, then it also paid for an unrepentant mans punishments.
      and it is so.

      janmariewoman

      Delete
  6. "CATCH" THIS!:

    no one "sign"ed the "Constitution".

    1. there are no "signatories"!
    ONLY WITNESSES.
    the signers all signed as witnesses, not signatories.

    look at it!

    witnesses are not "parties" to a "contract" or a "lawsuit", they merely "saw" something.

    2. and the people never ratified it either.

    there are no "parties" to the "Constitution". it has no "signatories" on it.

    without "signatories" it never went into effect.
    it is just an un"sign"ed "contract" that never went into effect.

    without signatories/"signers", its a total sham.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. could "vonbananna" be trying to "re-construct" an agreement with "the states" that pertains to a "constitution" that never even existed at all?!?!? :^• :/ :( ??

      Delete
    2. no one signed it.

      what good is it? :):):)

      Delete
    3. use it to say the people *VOLUNTEERED* to follow it... since its not in effect and is therefore not "the law"??

      There was never full disclosure either.
      LACK OF FULL DISCLOSURE = NO AGREEMENT.
      How can a man agree to something he isnt told about?
      thats right, he cant. :):):)
      NO DISCLOSURE = NO AGREEMENT.
      [NO "CONTRACT]."

      no signatories on their side plus no ratification by the people equals no contract.

      its TOO LATE to change that now.

      oh, and did i say:
      I DONT FORGIVE THEM?... ohyeh, i think i already did.
      oh well.

      i dont forgive them.

      janmarie:woman :)

      Delete
  7. i mean "fanannavonbandanna" seems to be claiming a reconstruction that is a United "Kingdom" Colonial PRE-Declaration of Independence HeadSHIP;
    with A Federated SHIP OF STATE;
    now even making the ridiculous and illogical claim that the Confederated Declaration of Independence of the free people is part of the reconstructed Colonial FEDERATION under a European Head of State who has serfs who follow orders.???

    geez.

    seriously, are you "bannnannnists" [compliments of winkwink] really missing all of this?

    no questions? nothing to say? :#:#:#?? :):):)
    keep it shut :#?? ...your comments not desired :#, accepted :#, heard :#??

    sounds lovely.
    NOT:):)!

    ReplyDelete

Place your comment. The moderator will review it after it is published. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason.