the new article "authorization to act -- joint chief of staff", will not allow commenting, so i will post here/other:
it seems that the Goldwater-Nichols Act of 1986 removed the authority to act from the Joint Chiefs of Staff. ... and apparently the Chiefs have been "Advisory Only" for the past 35 years; it looks like actual command goes from the Corps-e's President, to the DoD, to regional commanders. ________ i just looked up joint chiefs of staff and even wikipedia had:
"Following the Goldwater–Nichols Act in 1986, the Joint Chiefs of Staff do not have operational command authority, either individually or collectively, as the chain of command goes from the president to the secretary of defense, and from the secretary to the regional combatant commanders.[7]"
Why publish an Authorization for them to do something they have no authority to do?
the new article "authorization to act -- joint chief of staff", will not allow commenting, so i will post here/other:
ReplyDeleteit seems that the Goldwater-Nichols Act of 1986 removed the authority to act from the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
... and apparently the Chiefs have been "Advisory Only" for the past 35 years; it looks like actual command goes from the Corps-e's President, to the DoD, to regional commanders.
________
i just looked up joint chiefs of staff and even wikipedia had:
"Following the Goldwater–Nichols Act in 1986, the Joint Chiefs of Staff do not have operational command authority, either individually or collectively, as the chain of command goes from the president to the secretary of defense, and from the secretary to the regional combatant commanders.[7]"
Why publish an Authorization for them to do something they have no authority to do?
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=who+is+anna+von+reitz&atb=v208-1&ia=web
ReplyDelete