Sunday, May 3, 2020

Covid 19 Not Natural -- Neither is 5G


By Anna Von Reitz

In fact, Electromagnetic Radiation pollution is not natural and has a strong polluting effect on the environment, and is subject to the ENMOD Treaties as a result, wherever "non-domestic" populations are involved.
We, Americans, are "non-domestic" with respect to the Federal corporations and entities that are running like wild horses toward this new technological nightmare. We are being harmed and we have every right to bring forward our evidence and demand that these "tests" and other war simulations stop.
Please note:
The Japanese professor of physiology or medicine, Professor Dr Tasuku Honjo, caused a sensation today in the media by saying that the corona virus is not natural. if it is natural, it will not have affected the whole world like that. Because, depending on the nature, the temperature is different in different countries. if it were natural, it would only have affected countries with the same temperature as China. instead, it spreads to a country like Switzerland, the same way it spreads to desert areas. whereas if it were natural, it would have spread in cold places, but would have died in hot places. I have done 40 years of research on animals and viruses. It is not natural. It is manufactured and the virus is completely artificial. I have been working for 4 years in the Wuhan laboratory in China. I know all the staff of this laboratory well. I called them all after the Corona accident. but, all of their phones have been dead for 3 months. It is now understood that all of these laboratory technicians are dead.
Based on all of my knowledge and research to date, I can say this with 100% confidence that Corona is not natural. It did not come from bats. China made it. if what I say today turns out to be false now or even after I die, the government can withdraw my Nobel Prize. but China is lying and this truth will one day be revealed to all.
We still don't know if the "China virus" was actually a Chinese virus or one that was imported to China and then escaped there, or from Dr. Fauci and colleagues, or the Pirbright Institute, or that UN-connected lab in North Carolina, or from Fort Detrick, or Bill Gates and one of his numerous vaccine manufacturers, or just plain another CIA set-up ---- but we will know. We will get to the bottom of it and we will hang 'em high.
Meantime, take the presumptions about the "source" of the virus with a grain of salt, and instead focus on the fact that the virus unleashed in Wuhan was manufactured, not natural, and therefore subject to the ENMOD Treaties, too. More engineered pollution of the environment tested on innocent people who are not naturally "domestic" with respect to any of these corporations.

----------------------------

See this article and over 2400 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

6 comments:

  1. Professor Dr Tasuku Honjo according to articles says this is false.

    https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/info-tech/social-media/nobel-laureate-tasuku-honjo-refutes-claims-of-novel-coronavirus-being-man-made/article31453944.ece

    https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/nobel-laureate-tasuku-honjo-covid/

    https://www.asianscientist.com/2020/04/academia/nobel-laureate-tasuku-honjo-kyoto-university-coronavirus-man-made-claim/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes Jim, you are correct. The information is indeed false. Here is the source of the statement by Dr. Tasuku Honjo.
      https://www.kyoto-u.ac.jp/en/about/events_news/department/koto-kenkyu-in/news/2020/200427_1.html

      He did not make the statement. However, we should not forget Anna's conclusion of this article:

      "MEANTIME, TAKE THE PRESUMPTIONS ABOUT THE "SOURCE" OF THE VIRUS with a grain of salt, and instead focus on the fact that the virus unleashed in Wuhan was manufactured, not natural, and therefore subject to the ENMOD Treaties, too. More engineered pollution of the environment tested on innocent people who are not naturally "domestic" with respect to any of these corporations."


      Here is an excerpt from "The environmental consequences of war : legal, economic, and scientific perspectives" Page 96

      The second provision of Hague IV providing consequential environmental protection is Article 55, which requires a belligerent occupying enemy territory to safeguard public buildings, real estate, forests, and agricultural estates in accordance with the rules of usufruct. This principle allows use of the property by the occupying power, but no permanent alteration or destruction of it. Thus, an occupier may reasonably exploit natural resources in occupied territory, but may not act irresponsibly or maliciously in doing so. Applying the provision to the occupation of Kuwait, for example, damage to government-owned lands caused by the oil releases would violate the usufructory obligations of the Iraqi occupiers.

      A third provision of the Hague IV that could prove useful in protecting the environment is the Martens Clause contained in the preamble, which is generally considered to be customary international law:

      "UNTIL A MORE COMPLETE CODE of laws has been issued, the high Contracting Parties deem it expedient to declare that, in cases not included in the Regulations adopted by them, the inhabitants and the belligerents remain under the protection and the rule of the principles of the laws of nations, as they result from the usages established among civilized peoples, from the laws of humanity, and from the dictates of public conscience."

      This clause, which is also found in Protocol I, operates in the absence, or during the development, of more specific prescriptive norms. Thus, to the extent that customary or conventional law falls short in terms of environmental protection, resort may be made to the "laws of humanity" and "Dictates of public conscience" to provide some marginal degree of protection.

      The provision found in the 1949 Geneva Conventions considered most applicable to the environment is Article 53 of the Fourth Convention:

      ARTICLE 53:
      Any destruction by the Occupying Power of real or personal property belonging individually or collectively to private persons, or to the State, or to other public authorities, or to social or cooperative organizations, is prohibited, except where such destruction is rendered absolutely necessary by military operations.

      Defintions
      USUFRUCT: The right to enjoy the use and advantages of another's property short of the destruction or waste of its substance.

      Obligations of the Usufructuary
      At the Beginning of the Usufruct


      At the Beginning of Usufruct
      Art. 583. The usufructuary, before entering uponthe enjoyment of the property, is obliged:

      (1) TO MAKE, after notice to the owner or his legitimate representative, an inventory of all the property, which shall contain an appraisal of the movables and a description of the condition of the immovables;

      (2) TO GIVE SECURITY, binding himself to fulfill the obligations imposed upon him in accordance with this Chapter.

      Is this why the British Crown East India Company cataloged all the loot they stole from all lands during their colonial conquest? Usurfruct?

      Delete
  2. Just read a science report finding literally trillions of virus fall from the sky every day, have been for years and are one of the major parts of our organisms including plants and animals. Only a few are cataloged and the ones attacked with stupid kill off whatever single thing is deemed the magic end that never comes in reality does not work and forced vaccines are not very popular with people, I know for a fact that a base I worked on around 2004 showed on the list I had access too that only 40 percent took the vaccine ordered in by the commander despite threats we would not be paid if not taking it. 60 percent and even a guy was hired to come and speak, some "high" doctor and all of us called in to a big hall to listen to him try and convince people vaccines are safe as a mild scratch. Yet many pilots refused to smallpox due to them also having jobs with airlines. Airlines fired you if you had taken the vaccine due to known brain damage and they are not in the business of selling vaccines, have their own medical department and did not want brain damaged pilots.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Wake up people. There is NO virus creating this “pandemic”. The ruling class created the illusion of a problem, the media across the world has fed us the story they want us to know which has created the reaction with which they will try and offer the solution for the problem they created in the first place. We are living under a facist tyranny which has placed everyone in lockdown so we will be in a state of fear and not be able to think critically for ourselves. We can’t get together with other like minded people to talk about what is really going on and any videos on the internet that go against the “W.H.O.” Narrative are being deleted. Our freedom of speech is being torn from us. Gun legislation is being introduced into the house and senate to strip us of our 2nd amendment right and more. This is a complete smoke screen to what is really going on and everyone needs to wake up to the reality that our freedom and rights are being taken from us right under our noses. Notice how this initial lockdown came in small steps. This lockdown will slowly be released and within months or weeks of everything going back to normal there will be this new wave of people getting infected with the “virus” and because we didn’t “social distance” long enough, we will go strait back into a lockdown. Then in order for us to come out of the lockdown, we will be required to get the vaccine from which we will be microchipped. You can thank the Zionist piece of shit Bill Gates for that by the way. Wake up people. The last thing the ruling class want is an educated well informed people.

    ReplyDelete
  4. is it possible for trump to get rid of these vermin, or are we screwed?

    ReplyDelete
  5. I do believe a verminator has been, and is being used!

    ReplyDelete