Friday, May 11, 2018

Comment About NLA From Judge Anna


By Anna Von Reitz

NLA continues to cause trouble and get nowhere.  

When I talked to John Daresh (leader of NLA)  he was clueless and would not learn.  He thought he could sashay into a British Maritime Court and hand them an American Common Law Order and they would obey it. 

That is like going to Wendy's and trying to order Kentucky Fried Chicken. 

No matter how eloquent or proper your request, you aren't getting your desired product from that outlet. 

So what to do? 


NLA has yet to face the fact that courts are not buildings in the same sense that houses are not homes.  Just because the building is there doesn't mean the same good old American Court inhabits it.  In fact, the vermin started closing our courts in May of 1865 and "went in for the kill" in the 1930's. 

The result is that we have precious few American Common Law Courts functioning and they are running on empty.  

Mr. Daresh can't seem to wrap his head around the necessity of rebuilding the Courts and the Jury Pools -- which is what Michigan General Jural Assembly is doing. 

The two organizations SHOULD by all right and reason be working hand in hand to rebuild the jury pool and Court needed to support the Grand Jury.  Otherwise, you have a fancy presentment and no court to take it to. 

You continue to stand there ordering Kentucky Fried at Wendy's and wondering where your chicken is--- totally missing the point that somebody has to build a KFC franchise first. 

So here is Daresh and the NLA plodding forward and busting their guts for nothing year after year and they can't figure out why nothing is working.   Oh, it must be criminally corrupt courts, right?  Wrong.  The Maritime Courts are doing what they do, just like Wendy's pushing out hamburgers.  

I told them why they aren't getting anywhere at least five years ago and went off looking for someone with the good sense to build the Court and the Jury Pool necessary --- which is when I found the Michigan General Jural Assembly. 

When NLA members finally stop listening to Daresh, observe their lack of progress and start thinking of their Grand Juries as part of a Court that isn't there anymore-- they will finallly come to grips with the actual problem. 

You have to build the KFC franchise if you want Kentucky Fried Chicken. 

That may sound like a stupidly simple observation and it is, but as long as people keep assuming that the courts taking up residence in their court buildings --- like cuckoo birds stealing a nest-- are their Courts, they can't see the necessity of rebuilding our Courts. 

And they then stupidly flail around and attack other organizations that ARE actually rebuilding the courts. 

NLA is so confused and misled in its actions, it is pathetic.  I have heard the Maritime attorneys snarking about the organization and how clueless it is more than once. Too bad Daresh and the entire NLA couldn't be mice in a corner. 

Maybe they would finally get the message that without the right jury pool and court to take action on their presentments they are about as useful to the cause as a one-legged chair. 

I keep hoping that people will notice that they aren't getting anywhere with NLA and look for why not?  

Seems like even complete idiots would get tired of pushing on a pull door--- ? 

But apparently Daresh has his True Believers and the facts of the matter have yet to dawn on them. 

They are still there at the Wendy's counter waiting for their KFC order. And I am still standing here waiting for them to wake up and smell the java. 

----------------------------
See this article and over 900 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.

7 comments:

  1. well here is a current interview by him on a youtuber blogtalk with large coverage and audience/exposure. anna, you need to start hitting the big youtubers/blogtalkers like this girl, jordan sather, david seaman and roy potter for example to start.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XIEBkgBbtNI&lc=z22tcp5rgnvqtnsg004t1aokgkbbzqrnvgzjus4fcdtxbk0h00410.1526053411421846

    ReplyDelete
  2. also which anna did not mention, how can you assemble a jury of your peers/grand jury when they are U.S./14th amendment citizens/citizens of the United States? incorrect political status and standing.

    ReplyDelete
  3. How many are aware they've been mischaracterized, and thus fraud is fraud, who cares about the political status, you can clarify all that before your peers if you wish to remain a US citizen, otherwise make the presumption that they are your peers by fact of showing up, their deeds will paint them later, and they will either have integrity (unlike fraud) or be void.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I had a court issue up here in Oct 2012. A disagreement with the bank. It was Maritime for sure. Judge let prosecutor speak on the record and accepted a photo copy of a note as an original. When it came my turn , he would not let me even speak and ruled with the bank. However he did say common law courts do exist. He did not tell me where but from another source, I learned that when you come to court and contract by accepting the sound of your name, at that point you say "on and for the record , I am claiming this court under common law" and so it is. If the judge declares a recess for any reason, he comes back out in Maritime and you must once again claim on the record common law court.
    The right thing to do is not to admit to the name. I am man aka I AM. I had a buddy do that and the judge was on his feet screaming at him are you the person and he would not consent. Judge told sheriff to get him out of there and three escorted him out and one told him not to come back. They found him guilty while he was not present and mailed the decision. He should have declined the decision and registered mail back to court immediately but did not so the person not the man is guilty as the man acquiesced by non response.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Aloha Anna,I have a situation. Commercial property for sale in Hawaii and I have mailed as instructed Acknowledgement,Acceptance and Deed of Re-Conveyance to Bureau of Conveyances under Bureau of Land Management in the state;we have no Sec. of State. The Bureau of Conveyances received the documents through certified mail 5-1-2018.
    Also Ucc Financing Statement also received 5-1-2018
    Our commercial building has sold and they insist I sigh as Straw-man. I signed with-out prejudice. Is this the situation Chief Justice John Roberts is describing? The property is 50-50 with common law wife. Wife is citizen. Input required if you can. Thank you in advance Jeffrey Joseph

    ReplyDelete
  6. Joseph, let me know if you need a referral to one of Anna's LLF Lawyers.

    ReplyDelete

Place your comment. The moderator will review it after it is published. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason.