"Naturalized Citizenship" -- Unanswered Letters 14 --- For Mors

by Anna Von Reitz

Every day I get letters from people who have come to America seeking peace and freedom. These immigrants have come -- in many cases --- from war-torn places, out of situations of poverty, threat, and fear.  They have come as all our forefathers did in search of freedom and it is with a heavy heart that I have to tell them that they have been cheated.  

They have not been granted State Citizen status, because the lawful state governments were disrupted and never acted officially to grant it.  Instead, these immigrants and all  have only inherited "US citizenship"---- that is, they have been "claimed" as "citizens of the United States" merely "residing" here. 

The same profoundly limited status has been conferred on Native Americans, African Americans; and all those "corporate personas" created under the 14th Amendment of the Corporate Constitution and merely named after American State Nationals are considered "citizens of the United States".  So are federal employees and military personnel. 

What can I say? 

Little Words --- Unanswered Letters 13 -- For Richard

by Anna Von Reitz

This discussion began with the difference between "Common Law Courts" and "Courts of Common Law", in which I revealed the apparently astounding news that whenever you see the word "of" it indicates a secondary entity derived from or acting in behalf of something else, and in today's world almost always indicates an incorporated legal fiction of some kind operating in the international jurisdiction of the sea. 

"Common Law Courts" = Land Jurisdiction = Ohio State

"Courts of Common Law" = Sea Jurisdiction = State(s) of Ohio

-------------------

Look at the original constitution ---- what does it say?  "The Constitution for the united States of America". See?  The word "united" was originally used as an adjective describing the "States of America" acting as a union of states. 

States are political entities which are the possessions and agents of nations, which are also political entities, hence the use of the word "of"---- as in, for example, "Anne of Green Gables".  "Anne" comes from "Green Gables" but, at the same time, "Green Gables" belongs to "Anne"---and her family.   

The "States of America" belong as members in the "perpetual union" created by The Articles of Confederation (1781), but they do not belong to the Union thus created. 

We have to pay closer attention to all those "little words"----! 

---------------------------------------

See this article and over 200 others on Anna's website here:www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website. 

Revocation of Election to Pay Income Tax -- Unanswered Letters 12 -- For "Princess"

by Anna Von Reitz

Your revocation of election takes  effect normally with the beginning of the current Federal tax year, which in this case (assuming revocation today) would be July 1 of 2015.  You are still responsible for paying prior years unless you stipulate an earlier revocation date, for example, if they were claiming that you owed taxes from 2009 that you objected to then and ever since, you could make revocation effective July 1 of 2008. 

Whether you knew it or not, this "pledge" of your service as a Withholding Agent was always voluntary so long as you are not a federal employee (military or civilian), willingly operating as a federal corporation, of African American descent, a political asylum seeker, or welfare seeker. 

Dear Mr. Rothschild --- Payment of Account and Contract Status

Dear Mr. Rothschild, 

As you are aware we authorized payment of the entire UNITED STATES debt and have forwarded the paperwork to the Pope and to the Bank of International Settlements. 

As you are also aware, much of that debt had nothing legitimate to do with us nor with our presumed service contract with the UNITED STATES.  We have been obliged to pay for "services" we didn't order, and have not received services that we did stipulate, which is a problem that needs to be resolved by arbitration.  We have also been obliged to pay for services rendered to Third Parties absent any agreement ever signed by fiduciary deputies of ours. That also represents a problem requiring resolution and arbitration.  

Wake Up, Please, and Tell Me----- Are You A Puerto Rican?

by Anna Von Reitz

Your birthright nationality is as an American State Citizen.  You are a Native of the state where you were born.  See Article IV, Section 2 of the Federal Constitution --- “State Citizen”. 

Also see Government Printing Office Manual  (2000) at Section 5.22 and 5.23, page 93
( https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/GPO-STYLEMANUAL-2008/pdf/GPO-STYLEMANUAL-2008-7.pdf ) --- “Natives of a State” and “State Nationals” [also sometimes called “Domestic Aliens” and “Non-resident Aliens” in Federal publications.]

Nationalities, etc.

5.22  The table on Demonyms (demon names) in Chapter 17 “Useful Tables”:

5.23  In designating the natives of the States the following forms will be used:

Alabamian Alaskan Arizonan Arkansan Californian Coloradan Connecticuter Delawarean Floridian Georgian Hawaiian Idahoan Illinoisian Indianian Iowan Kansan Kentuckian Louisianian Mainer Marylander Massachusettsan Michiganian Minnesotan Mississippian Missourian

Montanan Nebraskan Nevadan New Hampshirite New Jerseyan New Mexican New Yorker North Carolianian North Dakotan Ohioan Oklahoman Oregonian Pennsylvanian Rhode Islander South Carolinian South Dakotan Tennessean Texan Utahn Vermonter Virginian Washingtonian West Virginian Wisconsinite Wyomingite

You are a living, breathing American and that means you are a Minnesotan, a Vermonter, a Texan---- not a “US citizen”.  

So what is a "US citizen"?

Shinola Talks and America Walks - Who are you Ammon Bundy?

by Anna Von Reitz

As one of the supposedly “fake” judges referenced in the recent NLA hit pieces, I have to observe that I am going about my lawful business unmolested by the Federales and if Ammon Bundy or any of these other fine patriots had listened to me instead of leaning on their own ignorance, they wouldn’t be in federal prison.

As Mark Twain observed— it isn’t what we know that gets us in trouble. It’s what we THINK we know that just ain’t so.

My sympathies and heart are 100% with these men, but the truth is that you can lead a horse to water, but….. as with Thomas Deegan in West Virginia, too.

The further truth is that these men are all naturally “State Citizens” under Article IV, Section 2 of the Federal Constitution, but they are being mischaracterized and prosecuted as “citizens of the United States” under Amendment XIV of the Corporate Constitution instead.

In their ignorance, they are clinging to this foreign political status— literally clinging to their chains—-and they are being prosecuted accordingly. Truly, I say to all of you that they will continue to be railroaded and “made examples of” and they will lose their good names and their property and spend many long years in jail and be held responsible for crimes they did not commit because they have forgotten who they are.

Which is the same problem that causes them to mistake who I am, too. Time to wake up and ask yourselves—- am I a Puerto Rican?

---------------------------------------

See this article and over 200 others on Anna's website here:www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website. 

More Confusion About Common Law Courts --- Unanswered Letters 11 -- Reply to Sir David Andrew

by Anna Von Reitz

In keeping with the general ignorance about Common Law Courts, I got this one in my box today: 

"Today I have listen to Sir David Andrew talk with Angela Stark on talkshoe and he said that is VERY wrong to use term Common Law Courts because he said they do not exist. Nany People have been jaild by using tern Common Law Courts he said.

Instead we should use COURTS OF COMMON LAW." 

Not necessarily.