by Anna Von Reitz
Your revocation of election takes effect normally with the beginning of the current Federal tax year, which in
this case (assuming revocation today) would be July 1 of 2015. You are still
responsible for paying prior years unless you stipulate an earlier revocation
date, for example, if they were claiming that you owed taxes from 2009 that you
objected to then and ever since, you could make revocation effective July 1 of
2008.
Whether you knew it or not, this "pledge" of your
service as a Withholding Agent was always voluntary so long as you are not a
federal employee (military or civilian), willingly operating as a federal
corporation, of African American descent, a political asylum seeker, or welfare
seeker.
The vast majority of American working people are
not "eligible" for Social Security and are not naturally "eligible" to pay
federal income tax, but during the Second World War a voluntary Victory Tax
program was established by which patriotic Americans were asked to "donate" a
portion of their wages equal to the federal income tax to the war effort.
Millions upon millions of working class Americans did so.
The sunset clause of this Act makes it clear that
any such election to pay federal taxes was supposed to automatically end with
the cessation of armed conflict---- at the latest, August of 1945. Rats being
what they are, the members of Congress made no provision for a general
cancellation of such "taxpayer accounts", and no instructions were given to
people as to how they could revoke their election to pay---- which has given
rise to the monstrous abuses of the Internal Revenue Service today.
You have created a
file in their system and an account number. They will continue to "fish" for
money from you. Keep a copy of your revocation documents and mailing receipts
and whenever they contact you, send them a new copy.
In whatever you do, firmly maintain your status as
an American State National (Article IV, Section 2) who is "retired" from any
presumption of United States citizenship.
---------------------------------------
See this article and over 200 others on Anna's website here:www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.
I made my revocation of election nunc pro tunc to my age of majority. It was unrebutted so stands as fact. I mailed it via registered mail return receipt, and never received the green card back. When I went to the post office and complained, all I got was a shoulder shrug, and a "there's nothing I can do" response. So be sure to save the receipt for payment of this service, and download the USPS tracking form which says when it was received and by whom.
ReplyDeleteThank you Margy for the info. I will make sure to do that.
ReplyDeleteThis ROE approach appears to be a rather complicated way to achieve what the Pete Hendrickson approach (Cracking the Code...) accomplishes: revoking the election; and the election is made by the private payer in the W-2, 1099, K-1 information returns --testifying that "income" or "wages" were paid. The private payee may rebut this false testimony in a substitute for W-2 or amended 1099, attached to an accurate 1040 and thereby revoke that "election".
ReplyDeleteSince the gov't has now been demoted to the status of: disinterested third party to the transaction, the IRS/DOJ retains no jurisdiction (or standing?) to attempt to challenge the payee's rebuttal. Why? The 1862 IRC plainly states:
..."Provided, That any party, in his or her own behalf,...shall be permitted to declare, under oath or affirmation, the form and manner of which shall be prescribed by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, that he or she was not possessed of an income of six hundred dollars, liable to be assessed according to the provisions of this act,...he or she may be permitted to declare, as aforesaid, the amount of his or her annual income, or the amount held in trust, as aforesaid, liable to be assessed, as aforesaid, and the same so declared shall be received as the sum upon which duties are to be assessed and collected." - THIRTY-SEVENTH CONGRESS. Sess. II. Ch. 119. 1862 Sec. 93 (page 475)
Note: "shall be permitted, shall be received"; shall is a mandatory term. If a payee believes he did not receive "income", his testimony must be accepted as the fact. If indeed, the gov't is the payer; and is therefore an interested second party to that transaction, only then is it permitted to attempt to rebut the payee's testimony.
Note 2: The "...may be permitted to declare..." sounds like an attempt to confuse the reader about the mandatory nature of the law
This is why no one (many thousands of educated filers over the last twelve years) using Hendrickson's approach to "revocation of election" has been prosecuted by the IRS for any unlawful actions.
Only Doreen Hendrickson was jailed for contempt of court for refusing to change her testimony to that dictated by the gov't. This proves the point, don't you think? Ones own testimony is required to affirm "election", thus allowing lawful assessment and collection of ones property.
As I understand it, Peter Hendrickson was jailed for alleged "intent" -not believing the contents of his own book.
The logic presented to the jury being: no one could sincerely believe that the income tax is voluntary.
NOTE: Doreen Hendrickson's Federal appeals rejection decision has set a new precedent: it is now lawful for the gov't to exact compelled testimony. This also jeopardizes ROE attempts.
I'd like to know more about this tactic.
Delete