Friday, September 16, 2016

Emergency Motion Filed to Dismiss Oregon Bundy Case

Emergency Motion Filed to Dismiss Oregon Bundy Case




An emergency motion to dismiss charges in the ongoing case in Oregon regarding the Bundy’s and several other defendants was filed on September 12, 2016.
According to the filing:
The Court is familiar with the issues raised concerning federal subject matter jurisdiction and adverse possession. [#649, #1228] At last Friday’s hearing, the Court said to undersigned counsel, somewhat exasperatedly: “You don’t give up, do you?” It was a moment of levity at the end of a trying week, and counsel did not conclude anything further from it. But counsel did not realize that, just a few hours earlier, the government filed documents purportedly supporting a request for judicial notice regarding ownership of the Malhuer National Wildlife Refuge (“Refuge”). [#1229, #1230] Those documents, filed at almost the last moment before Defendant Ammon Bundy is to stand trial, raise several urgent legal issues, contradicting and disproving the government’s prior statements regarding subject matter jurisdiction, and necessitating the relief sought herein.
The declaration also helps demonstrate how the evidence that the government intends to introduce at trial was seized without due process, raising significant issues which must be resolved before any trial on the underlying charges. For the reasons asserted, Mr. Bundy moves to immediately enjoin the government’s prosecution, to dismiss this matter with prejudice, to restore Mr. Bundy and the Citizens for Constitutional Freedom to the land and property they possessed prior to the government’s unlawful actions dispossessing them of that land and property, to suppress all evidence obtained by the government from the occupation site after Mr. Bundy was arrested on January 26, 2016, and for the other relief set forth below.
Veritas 13Fox and “Stacy” break down what the motion means in this audio presentation.



Stacy, has been looking into the issue of the illegal and unconstitutional occupation of state land by the central government since 2012. There is no doubt that DC wishes to control as much of the land and mineral resources as possible and they have shown they will use forceviolate constitutionally protected rights and even destroy property to maintain their hold on land that belongs to the states and to the people.

The question now is will the central government save face and see that the charges are dropped from the remaining defendants or will Judge Brown do the right thing and dismiss the case altogether. Her track record is not very favorable to that line of thinking.
----------------------------------------------------------
More articles you need to read on this subject.

http://rangefire.us/2016/09/14/oregon-standoff-trial-serious-questions-of-subject-matter-jurisdiction/

http://outpost-of-freedom.com/blog/?p=1652

3 comments:

  1. I surmise that case law is about ready to be set again by this judge, in favor of the govt. and against us all . Get ready for more control and theft of property. Ill be totally surprised if it doesnt work out that way. If it is dismissed it wont be "with prejudice"... That will give them another chance at charging them again later, when there is less attention drawn to it.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thank God this information was released. The crooked court should (must) dismiss the case against Ammon Bundy and all those unlawfully jailed for defending their Constitutional and land rights. It was clear in the beginning the BLM and FBI had no right or jurisdiction to bully these American patriots. Now the BLM and FBI must be held accountable for the murder of Lavoy Finicum.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This news needs to be covered truthfully by the main media simply to educate the confused public about the Harney County and Bundy issues. The Bundy name needs to be cleared by the main media because the media contributed to demonizing these honest patriots who were persecuted unlawfully by government agencies. This case has enormous impact to enlighten land owners about the federal govt squatting unconstitutionally on private state land.

    ReplyDelete

Place your comment. The moderator will review it after it is published. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason.