Paul Stramer - Lincoln County Watch: Nov 11, 2026

Wednesday, November 11, 2026

International Public Notice: To the Generations of Fraud and Evil

By Anna Von Reitz

***In this IPN we further expose the vicious war profiteers. Please note that it wasn't an English Parliament acting as Trustees of England's vacated land jurisdiction after the regicide of Charles I, it was a British Territorial Parliament non-consensually occupying this position of Public Trust.***

First consider the word, "empire" as opposed to "kingdom".

In the organizational framework first imposed by pagan Rome and later by the Holy Roman Empire, an empire is a creature of the air jurisdiction, while a kingdom is in possession of the land jurisdiction from which all other jurisdictional powers flow.

From the very early days, the kings ruling over the nations were Lords of the Land. King Saul and King David were not Emperors and would have considered the whole artificial separation of the air jurisdiction from the land jurisdiction ridiculous, much less the artificial creation of separate "rulerships" and crowns associated with these mental constructs.

Nonetheless, by the time of the later Roman Empire, the Popes were giving out crowns and land jurisdiction authority to their "kings", sea jurisdiction to their "monarchs", and air jurisdiction authority to their "emperors".

Each jurisdiction had its own crown and its own emblems of rulership. Let's use England as the most familiar example:

England was a sovereign nation long before Rome invaded, with its own clans and villages, its own rulers, its own culture and traditions, which generated numerous "kings" ruling over various parts of the country and representing different nations living on the same land mass -- for example, "King Vortigern".

The Romans, however, considered England and the English people to be vassals of Rome, and under the Holy Roman Empire (800 A.D.) the Popes began crowning their own Kings of England in Coronation ceremonies.

These Holy Roman "kings" receive their crowns from the Pope or vassal religious authorities, like the Archbishop of Canterbury, and wear this as a separate land jurisdiction crown and they carry a scepter.

The same "king" then also operated as a Monarch of the sea and wore a sea jurisdiction crown bequeathed via an "Initiation" rite ---and he carried a trident. Finally, he acted as an Emperor of the air, and wore an imperial crown granted to him via a process of "Inauguration" and carried a globe-topped wand called an "orb".

Scepter, trident, and orb are emblems of the land, sea, and air, and they amount to three different magic wands -- think Harry Potter, but all those wands were capped, because all these men served the Popes who gave them the crowns. These "Kings of...." operated under the Pope's delegated authority as functionaries, and were never natural, independently sovereign kings.

This difference between English Kings and Kings of England has bedeviled people since the 1200's. Let's finish it.

King Ban was a French King, but King John was a King of England and that small word "of" makes all the difference between a national estate kingdom and a Papal estates "kingdom of" office.

"Of" means "between", "in addition to", "apart from" and "belonging to" depending on the context. "King of England" can mean "King apart from England" or "King belonging to England" with equal force.

Pay attention. This is the source of all the so-called mischief, all the impersonation and the jurisdictional trespasses that have landed the world in its current miasma.

Kings were replaced by "Kings of ______" and an entirely different, foreign system of law was imposed on the nations (people) via this substitution fraud.

"King" John of England was a "King of England" working under powers delegated to him by the Pope. He was not an English King.

Also notice that only the "Kings of _________" had separated crowns, wands, and jurisdictions.

National kings like King David had only one encompassing authority and didn't wear crowns at all. They wore "anointings" -- an authority symbolized by an "anointing with oil". Such kings operated seamlessly in all three jurisdictions and owed their crowns directly to the God that sanctified them.

The Coronation of land jurisdiction "Kings of_______" somewhat copies this ancient rite but falls short of anointing with oil and substitutes kissing the Bible -- with the Kiss of Judas -- instead. This is because no priest of the Roman Church ever held the authority to anoint with oil.

It is this "second baptism" -- with oil -- that is entirely lacking, and which has kept the gateway between physical life and spiritual life sealed for eighty generations.

When the thugs and robbers trespassed against me, pretending that I was the debtor and that they were the creditors, they spent five nights and five days ransacking my house. They brought in vans full of special equipment and camped out, tearing through paperwork, trying to access my computers, photographing everything. And found nothing.

They missed a tiny vial of oil.

They didn't know what it was.

In their rush to find something to incriminate me or my family, with their fevered minds thinking of bank receipts and stockpiles of money, private correspondences with foreign powers, gun caches, drugs, or whatever else they hoped to discover, they missed a tiny vial of oil imported from Israel.

They probably threw it out in the trash.

It's only now, and very dimly, that they begin to realize that they are dealing with the Lords of Time and the Celestial Kingdoms. The true kings and the true kingdoms still stand on Earth, and I have been anointed. They are too late.

The last has become the first.

The arrow, as we have said before, has already found its mark.

The death of their evil and fraud is unwinding in a slow dance, each step in a spiral they cannot avoid. The door to Heaven stands open and will not be shut again, for all those who search --- or who directly remember how to find it.

The other doors are shut and only silence rules the Interstice.

Think on this: the perfect justice of the True God has come at last.

And the Evil Ones are just now waking up to this.

Those who sentenced the Lord of Life to death for raising Lazarus now have their answer. The end of their generations has already come and only the righteous will be remembered.

Issued by:

Justice Anna Maria Riezinger - Fiduciary

The United States of America

In care of: Box 520994

Big Lake, Alaska 99652

November 10th 2026

------------------

See this article and over 6000 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.

How do we use your donations? Find out here.

*** This IPN has been reissued with the written declaration attached and covers claims made by an indigenous tribe in New Zealand and their representative a General Belton from California, who presides over their commercial court of claims as Chief Justice and "UBO" -- that is, the "Ultimate Beneficial Owner" of their commercial operations. General Belton is also associated with the discredited World Martial Authority and "Judge" Adriaan Fondse who counterfeited our Fiduciary's signature without remorse and assisted in commandeering our American-chartered International Trade Bank doing business as The Global Family Bank (Unincorporated) and impersonating it as an incorporated British Commercial Bank franchise, instead. While we understand the inherent natural sovereignty of the living people of New Zealand, we do not believe that they meant to bless General Belton with the entire ownership interest in their national commercial ventures, nor do we credit the idea of individual men being vested with the beneficial ownership of all the commercial assets of any living nation. This is just another "narrative" being promoted by those who are trying to maintain a coercive monopoly interest for themselves and their associates. Let's get into the first part of this. ***

International Public Notice: Giving What They Do Not Possess

At some time in the Nineteenth Century, a British Monarch, having lost his land jurisdiction and working at the pleasure of the Parliament in his remaining jurisdiction on the sea, recognized the sovereignty of an indigenous tribe in New Zealand --- a fact that they have used to claim that they have sovereignty on the land, air and water of New Zealand and then, have set up a sovereign court to hear claims.

By the same measure, King George fully admitted that our nation-states in this country are "free, sovereign, and independent" and this stands in public and contractual evidence as part of the Treaty of Paris, 1783, which went on to establish the British Territorial United States of America--- a jurisdictional enclave more commonly thought of as "the United States Territories and Possessions", which does to this day include the British Commonwealth nation of Puerto Rico.

So, a British Monarch also recognized the nation-states of our country as sovereign entities, in the same way as that tribe in New Zealand was recognized -- for all that matters. Anyone could and should recognize as much.

The hat-tipping by a British Monarch is not the source of our sovereignty, which arises under far more basic and honest conditions, evidenced everywhere in the Natural World, and by our own determination to assert our independence from the British Government, including the British Monarchy, and its commercial corporations for eight long years of bloody and fully declared military opposition.

The Brits didn't give us anything, and obviously, the British Monarch could not give us recognition as a sovereign nation-state, when he could not operate in that capacity himself.

No British Monarch, then or now, can speak one word concerning our sovereignty, and neither can any foreign "President" of a commercial corporation, for the simple reason that they are not operating in sovereign offices themselves.

It was the Sultan of Morocco who first recognized the sovereignty of our country and our Government, just as it is that the sovereign land jurisdiction government of Ethiopia was the first fully sovereign nation to welcome us back in 2015.

It is wonderful to know that we were not forgotten, even if we appeared to forget ourselves for a time, and looked to be under a Destiny Swapping Spell in which the British Territorial Citizenry attempted to pass themselves off as the American People, and then further attempted to misrepresent the American People as citizens of the United States, all conjured up under the so-called Fourteenth Amendment.

Witchcraft notwithstanding, take notice that the Brits are still up to their old tricks, trying to bust the nations on a wooden nickel, or, to be more exact, trying to pay off their debts on assets that belong to other people.

We are not denying the inherent sovereignty of the people of New Zealand, but neither are we yielding our sovereignty to them. Instead, we offer our recognition of their natural sovereignty and extend our hands in friendship.

We do not, however, accommodate or accept any presumption of custodial interest, trusteeship, guardianship, or other claim of ownership or assertion of any territorial protectorate over our sovereign assets and prerogatives by any other nation-state or citizenry whatsoever.

Under Law and Contract all purloined assets must be returned to our country unharmed, to be administered by our traditional and customary American Government.

Thank you for your prompt attention and practical intervention to prevent any further mischief by Territorial or Municipal actors.

We have our own Federation Court to replace those functions that would have otherwise been delegated to the Federal Republic and its Article III Court established under The Constitution for the united States of America and we, Americans, neither need nor seek any service from foreign territorial District Courts, State-of-State franchise courts, Municipal DISTRICT courts, STATE OF STATE Municipal franchise COURTS, administrative courts, magistrate courts, commercial courts of other kinds, foreign probate courts, statutory courts or military courts operating in any extra-jurisdictional or extra-territorial capacity.