Sunday, September 14, 2025

International Public Notice: Facts and Law Forwarded to Responsible Parties

 By Anna Von Reitz

The following three (3) attachments are being forwarded to Governor Dunleavy and Officers of the COURT that is misaddressing me as a presumed to exist Federal PERSON. 

The information (as in criminal information) being provided to the Territorial Administrators and Municipal OFFENDERS alike is self-explanatory, except for the final attachment which is the Affidavit of Pre-Payment, which requires some observations. 

The Affidavit of Pre-Payment is being made by the Territorial States' Citizenry, that is, the British Territorial Persons that Franklin Delano Roosevelt addressed at the March 6th 1933 Governor's Conference, and who returned the support of their "states and citizenry".  

Essentially, they agreed to act as thugs against their employers, all based on the patently False Claim that all Americans were somehow magically rendered Municipal "citizens of the United States" and liable under the so-called (unratified by the States of the Union) Fourteenth Amendment. 

This is where you get travesties like the present example, where the self-interested Vermin are pretending that a Municipal citizen of the United States named "ANNA RIEZINGER" exists.  

They basically agreed to promote this scam against their employers in order to pay off their own corporation's debts, and self-servingly agreed to promote this gross False Claim in Commerce.  

So the attached Affidavit is their Affidavit, not mine; their debt to the central banks may be paid off, but their debt to me, a victim of this fraud, is not paid.  Their entire National Debt is my National Credit, which has not been remunerated by either THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INC. or The United States of America, Inc. or United States of America, Inc. or any other commercial, municipal, or territorial corporation.  

All they have done is take, take, take from me and our States of the Union, their faithful employers, under False Pretenses, False and Contrived Legal Presumptions, and False Claims in Commerce.  

So when you read the attached Affidavit realize which way the wind blows and where this affidavit is coming from; the British Territorial paid off their debts by pretending that everyone else in this country was a Municipal "citizen of the United States" --- a gross lie and dishonor against the Public Interest of the States of the Union and the living people these thugs were hired to protect.

Let God have mercy on their souls. 

Issued by: 
Anna Maria Riezinger -- Fiduciary
The United States of America
In care of Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 99652

September 14th 2025


https://annavonreitz.com/exibit8aclearfielddoctrine.pdf

 

------------------
See this article and over 5500 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

International Public Notice: The Dangers Posed by Ignorant Thugs

 By Anna Von Reitz

Many of you are concerned about my health and welfare.  So am I. 
Tomorrow, armed and very ignorant thugs are set to arrive at my house, board my "vessel" and seize my property under False Pretenses. 

These are the same thugs that have been harming people and ruining lives all over this country for six generations. 

They have no right to do this.  They have no right to force the use of their ideas on anyone, much less charge people "taxes" because they unknowingly use copyrighted intellectual property descriptions.  

In my case, my property is separately surveyed and recorded apart from any use or contract with the now-defunct MATANUSKA-SUSITNA BOROUGH, INC. and has been for years. It has a separate address.  It is fully posted. My husband's estate owns the underlying United States Land Patent. On top of which, all debts of all and any Federal PERSONS related to me have been indemnified and prepaid.  

So, their "COURT" had no validated commercial claim or proof of debt.  I presented four potent contracts that prove everything I or anyone else could need to prove to overturn any unproven allegation of debt or public interest in my house and my land.  

They ignored this.  Why?  Because they are a commercial corporation and it is in their self-interest to try to steal my property by pretending that it's their property.  

The fact is, they don't own any land and never did.  They don't own anything except descriptions and labels they made up out of thin air and attached to my property.  

This is called "illegal latching" and the fact that they, the MATANUSKA-SUSITNA BOROUGH, INC. was guilty of this on a large and organized scale does not change the nature of the crime.

The Territorial Administration has allowed these Municipal Bounders to come in and make these false claims because they get a 40% kickback.  They let these COURTS operate on American soil because of the payola involved and the assets seized using this bogus set-up. 

About all anyone can do to put a stop to this is let the Vermin know that all eyes are on them and we know who they are and what they are doing --- and what they are leaving undone. 

The Territorial Government is supposed to protect each and every one of us from this sort of thing happening, not a blind eye.  The actual State Troopers owe the living man their "good faith service" and I hold my property as a living woman.  Instead, they let the phony Municipal "STATE" troopers come in and start a disturbance, and after the fact the Territorial State Troopers come in and arrest everyone, with or without shooting, based on the idea that the victim was in the wrong and owed a "public debt" tied to their own paychecks. 

Though none of this is true or right, that's what they do and what they have done for a long time.  The dictum has been, "You will use our products and you will keep on using them and paying whatever we charge for them --- or else!"  

But who has the contract for their "services"?   The Territorial Administrators are the ones that let them come here and provide services --- presumably to Territorial Persons, not the rest of us.  
Yet, when we say no and establish property physical surveys and separate our holdings from all "public" encroachments, when we do what they did and make up our own address and record it -- then we are competing with them and mowing our own lawns, and they actually think they can force us to receive and pay for their "services". 

If so, then any corporation, any vendor at all, with a large enough customer base, can force you to buy and pay for their toothpaste, their ham hocks, and their accounting services to determine your "taxes".  This entire country can be run like a monopolized "Company Store" set up by Nineteenth Century Robber Barons, where their "government services corporation" is the only source for everything and you are totally dependent on them and at their mercy.  

They are on their way to doing precisely that right now and we have to stop them.  

Any idea that any COURT run by the Company that runs the Company Store is going to grant your right to provide your own services and live apart from their monopoly would be naive.  These are private corporate tribunals run by the very offenders engaged in this monopoly.  And when you say no, and give them fair Notice that you don't need or require their "services", they claim you owe them credit (not money; they can't claim that) which you do not owe. 

It's a far more grandiose version of the old Magazine Subscription scam.  Back in the 1970's you'd get offers in the mail, offering a free subscription to a magazine, like "Field and Stream".  If you accepted the "free" offer and didn't cancel, they got to charge you for a year's subscription.  But they got greedy.  Soon, they tagged people for a two year subscription based on acceptance of one sample copy.  Next, they started sending multiple "free" copies of half a dozen magazines.... soon, people were stuck paying for half a dozen magazines they didn't actually order and didn't want.  

It's the same thing with these "government services vendors" --- which are just commercial corporations like McDonald's or yes, Publisher's Clearinghouse.  Like the magazines you don't want and didn't subscribe to, they just keep providing their "service" and their "products" to you and shove, shove, shove.  

I served the MATANUSKA-SUSITNA BOROUGH, INC. multiple times asking them exactly what services they were providing me and what did these services cost?  I offered to pay them my fair share for services I agreed to.  They never replied and they got full Due Process Service each time --- three Notices, each time.  All acquiesced to on their part. 

So, at that point, by law, it's on them not me. 

Brigands don't listen and don't play by the rules. 

What can you do?  You can alert the members of the "Alaska" Congressional Delegation.  You can alert the Governor's Liaison, Jordan Shilling.  You can alert the Alaska Judicial Council.  You can call the Alaska Department of Public Safety.  You can make them all aware --- and liable --- for continued commercial crimes and armed racketeering taking place here or anywhere else in America.  

Read the Federal Territorial Code Titles 5 and 22, which describe in some detail the Territorial Corporations run by the British Crown and how they are limited and supposed to function. Then read the Clearfield Doctrine.  

Dressing up in a uniform doesn't change the fact that these are just commercial "service" corporations, and "private" security personnel ---and their officers and officials have in fact no authority to address you or me, no right or reason to enter a posted and privately surveyed land parcel. 

In the same way, calling a service fee or a licensing fee a "tax" doesn't make it one.  

If we don't want to receive or buy their "services" a simple no should be enough. 

How would you like it, if McDonald's employees could leave a stack of hamburgers on your doorstep every day--- whether you wanted them or not --- and charge you for the burgers, their "delivery service" and their "accounting service" according to an undisclosed fee schedule? 

That is what the MATANUSKA-SUSITNA BOROUGH, INC. was doing.  That's why it's bankrupt.  Look in the UCC unit files and you will see that it is one of the corporations I named and liened for the unjust enrichment they extracted as "taxes" without a contract, without a fee schedule, without ever telling anyone precisely what services they were providing or how these "taxes" were apportioned. 

This is precisely my situation with the former MATANUSKA-SUSITNA BOROUGH, INC. only in their case, I could never determine based on any reply from them, exactly what "service" were they purportedly providing? 

There was no list of services, no stated cost, no service standards, no accountability. Ever. 

Yet, in fact, they are just vendors like any other commercial corporation.  Can your local grocery store put out a pile of grapes with no price attached, and then later charge you whatever they want?   No, of course, not --- so why should these "government" vendors get away with that?  

They are trying to use the old "Fourteenth Amendment citizen" scam and claim that a FEDERAL (Municipal) PERSON named "ANNA RIEZINGER" exists and that I am operating "HER".  Well, that's a good trick if so; I returned the only such FEDERAL PERSON issued in my name to the Secretary of the U.S. Treasury years ago. He's my direct Trustee responsible for dealing with any and all bills or other problems that crop up as a result of "HER" existence or any other FEDERAL PERSON claiming to operate under my name. 

So, it's a collusion between the Territorial Government Corporations failing to do their duty -- in view of a 40% kickback --  and the Municipal Government acting as strong-arm sales and collection "agencies".  

If they come on my privately surveyed and separate property tomorrow and shoot me, you will know what went on and be in position to sue them as a group for my wrongful death.  Bring your claims under the Uniform Commercial Code(s) and rip them all a new one.  

Meantime, about all you can do is pray and call and email the Vermin and let them know that you see them for who and what they really are --- and you are watching them, keeping track of their activities and encroachments, and using all peaceful means to hold them accountable.  

Sooner or later, truth and reason win out over venality and greed.  People eventually wake up, question the nature and authority of these "authorities"---- and then, finally, the People will govern themselves as they ought to, and tell their public servants where to go, how high to jump, when and where, which services they have ordered (the eighteen self-evident in the Federal Constitutions) and hold these foreign, for-profit "governmental services" corporations feet first to the fire if they or their State of State franchises encroach on your property or rights or anything else rightfully belonging to you.  

They don't have a contract with you.  They have a contract with each other, and are acting in collusion against your Public Interest for their unjust private gain.  

And all while the Territorial Government, at least, is under contract to provide you with "good faith service" and responsible for directing their Municipal Government employees how to behave, too.  

That's why I addressed Governor Dunleavy in two specific offices ---in his Territorial Office as "Mr. Governor Michael P. Dunleavy" and as Municipal "GOVERNOR MICHAEL P. DUNLEAVY" when I had the Process Server deliver our Writ of Assistance Order. 

The Territorial Government is supposed to be protecting me, not their own Municipal Subcontractors.  Those Municipal Subcontractors aren't even supposed to be here on the land and soil of the States. They are supposed to be limited to operations within the District of Columbia, but instead, all these Municipal Corporations have piggybacked on the Territorial Corporations like fleas on a dog, so the Territorial officials are the ones responsible for their presence and their operations here.  

And neither one should be addressing us or shoving additional services down our throats (beyond the services due under the Federal Constitutions) or making false claims in commerce concerning us.  

When the facts come out, it will be apparent that I have never knowingly, willingly, or voluntarily been a British Territorial Person nor a Municipal PERSON, either.  I am and hope to remain that simple thing --- a peaceable Wisconsinite, owed every jot of the Federal Constitutions. The Act of State I showed and referenced to the COURT on September 5th 2025 more than adequately demonstrates that and makes them liable for any action they take against me or my private property.  

They can build a bonfire on the adjoining public road easement for all I care, so long as it doesn't harm a single leaf on one of my birch trees. 

The "State of Alaska, Inc." and its "Department of Public Safety, Inc." have been fully informed that these Municipal Marauders intend to engage in strong-armed racketeering disguised as a public "judicial" process at my house tomorrow afternoon.  

If the "Governor" doesn't do his duty and the Alaska Judicial Council doesn't do their duty and the Congressional delegates fail to do theirs, it will be apparent to everyone on Earth exactly what a nest of dishonorable vipers have taken root in America.  This isn't a problem unique to Alaska.  It's a problem in every State of the Union.  

You can all look up the Alaska Congressional Delegation easily enough and "act" as if you are Territorial Persons on a temporary basis; give them an ear-full for me.  

Jordan Shilling, Liaison for Governor Dunleavy can be reached at jordan.shilling@alaska.gov

The attorney for "ALASKA, INC." the new Municipal Corporation acting as a "Successor to Contract"  that is trying to promote the idea that I owe the defunct MATANUSKA-SUSITNA BOROUGH, INC. "tax" debts is Meredith Ahearn at ammers@gci.net. (She's technically working for PACIFIC RIM, LLC, but that's just another franchise of the same parent corporation.) 

All these people are 100% personally and commercially and individually liable for any harm that comes to me or my property as a result of their own evil activities and false accusations.  

No matter what happens, don't let the rats win.  Keep on them. Keep undermining their gross over-reaches.  Alert everyone to the nature of these "governing bodies" as self-interested foreign commercial corporations in the business of providing "government services".  Realize that commercial corporations have no right or authority to "tax" anyone, and realize that their service fees and contracts have to be stipulated like any other commercial corporation.  

Issued by: 
Anna Maria Riezinger -- Fiduciary
The United States of America
Alaska State Court Justice
In care of Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 99652

September 14th 2025

------------------
See this article and over 5500 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

The Battle of Rexie and Midgie

 By Anna Von Reitz

Suppose I am a guy from Boston and I bought a pedigreed Boston Bull Terrier whose breeder named him Rex Maximillian Holiday the Third.  

I bought him fair and square, have the Bill of Sale, the Paid in Full Receipt, the puppy photo, the pedigree, the whole nine yards and then some — and I decide to call him "Rexie Boy" or "Rexie" for short.  

I am a cheap bastard and a free-thinking American sod so I decide not to REGISTER Rex with the American Kennel Club even though I could.  I decide an old-fashioned ID tag on his collar should be good enough and I get him recorded as a patient with a well-established veterinarian service.  

All is right with the world, until my live-in girlfriend, a redhead called "Kate" and nicknamed "Kate Hammerfist" turns into a Vegan and decides that Rexie Boy looks more like a "Midgie".  So she calls Rexie by the name "Midgie" and is stubborn about it.  

Now, we are not married and there's no contracts involved, she has just been living under my roof for free for the last several years, and occasionally feeding me breakfast —-and annoying me by calling my dog "Midgie".  

One dismal day in the fall she tells me her Vegan Chef friend, Alphonso, has asked her to marry him and move to Spain.  

Well, what's a fellow to do? 

I wasn't motivated enough to marry her or anyone else the last several years.  I thought a live-in girlfriend and a dog and two goldfish named "Gums" and "Bubba" were expense and trouble enough. 

So I wished her and Alphonso all the best luck in the world and asked what I could do to help? 

Pity me!  I woke up an hour later on the kitchen floor, cold conked by a vicious left to the jaw and right to the solar plexus.  Yes, I could have died.  That's where the "Hammerfist" nickname comes in, but it gets worse. 

She has flown off the handle and out the window, probably on a broomstick, and to make it all worse, she has taken my dog!  

Long story short, she has possession and he answers equally to "Rexie Boy" and "Midgie".  

Now we are in a legal wrangle and the question is— does her intellectual property interest in the name "Midgie" applied to my dog and her possession of my dog by theft amount to a valid claim of ownership? 

And the answer is — no. 

Calling someone else's dog by a different name, say, Alphonso, doesn't create a new property interest.  All it does is create a new dog name, not a new dog. 

She can have all property rights to the dog name "Midgie" as far as I am concerned.  She can call a dozen dogs "Midgie" if she wants to, but calling my dog by her favorite dog name does not magically make my dog her dog. 

As for possession, theft by pirates does not change ownership.  That's the law and has been the law since pirates were invented. 

I drag out my Bill of Sale from the Breeder and the pedigree and puppy photo and ownership record (with my name on it as "Owner") from Barns Veterinary Service, and you would think that would be enough, wouldn't you?  

Kate says, "Possession is nine-tenths of the law!" 

And I shout, "Among Barbary pirates!" 

The Judge says, "Mr. Kate, please keep your voice down."

I am momentarily too stunned by being called, "Mr. Kate" to say or think anything.  

"Why couldn't you just marry me!" Kate sobs in front of God and everyone. "Then I wouldn't have to leave my home and move to Spain where I don't know anyone! Midgie is my only friend!  My only companion!"

"What about Alphonso?" I jerk back awake out of my "Mr. Kate" bad dream.  "All Mi— bah! All Rexie can do that Alphonso can't do, is pee on your leg in public." 

"Mr. Kate!" The Judge roars. "That is quite graphic enough!  The Court is offended."

"So," I reply in an even tone, "give me my dog and I will go away and not offend anyone."

This falls into a pit of silence — except for Kate Hammerfist's moaning and weeping on a chair somewhere left center in the room. I close my eyes so I can't see her draped around Rexie like a rumpled silk scarf, and can't  see his beady eyes silently pleading for help.  

"Mr. Kate," the Judge resumes,"you are correct. Renaming a dog or any inheritable property does not —in itself—-create a new property interest in it.  You do have the provenance of the dog, vested in a pedigree. You have identified the Breeder and the Veterinarian has identified you as the owner of Rexie Boy....and you do have a Bill of Sale for a puppy with extremely similar markings....  it appears the dog is yours." 

Oh, no doubt.  And "Midgie" doesn't really exist, it's just a dog name looking for an unwary dog it can latch onto. 

My thumb is shoved into my cheekbone. My middle finger is stabbed into my forehead.  I can hardly believe that facts have any meaning—"provenance", "Bill of Sale", Vet records, photos.  

"Oh, all right, dammit," I hear my own voice coming from a great distance, "I'll marry you."

The Judge sucks in his breath. Kate Hammerfist winds down the tears to quiet sniffing and looks at me, clearly not believing her good luck. Rexie jumps off her lap. Bedlam ensues. Alphonso slinks out the backdoor of the courtroom shaking his head. 

Here is my law lesson for you:

There's things and there's names for things and there's descriptions of things and labels for things but they aren't things.  Names, labels, and descriptions may be intellectual property if they are copyrighted or patented or trademarked, but they are not physical property.  

Remember this separation between fact— that warm little bundle of love biting your thumb, that's fact, that is "substantive"— and fiction, which includes the names, labels, and descriptions we make up out of thin air or adopt because it sounds good. 

How about a Boston Bull Terrier called Alphonso?  Alf for short?  

------------------
See this article and over 5500 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

International Public Notice: Specific Proofs Required

 By Anna Von Reitz

Questions have arisen concerning the Five (5) Proofs required to establish the existence of individually named public trust entities. 

Taken directly from the contract 2017- 012486 - 0, pages 1- 2:

(1) a properly executed Death Certificate with a plainly stated title of "Death Certificate" stating the time, place, and manner of death signed off on by a competent coroner; (2) proof of actual paid employment by the municipal or territorial government, including position, supervisor, hours worked, job assignments, place of employment, departmental affiliation, and other details establishing actual, true, employment by a federal municipal or territorial entity; (3) proof of voluntary "personhood" together with stated proof of intent and full disclosure as required by Public Law; (4) proof of colored person status established by DNA analysis accompanied by a voluntary waiver of equal civil rights provisions; (5) proof of political asylum or voluntary seeking of federal benefits under conditions of full disclosure. 

It is expected that the Public will be somewhat surprised and maybe confused by these requirements, but each one has its due function and importance. 

Requirement 1:

If the Perpetrators wish to tie their commercial claims to a "birth" certificate of a living man or woman and their physical estate and transfer that living man or woman into a new "Estate" in a different jurisdiction of law (what happens when an American Infant Decedent Estate is created and an almost-identical appearing British Territorial Person is created out of thin air) it follows that a Death Certificate must be provided. 

If the Perpetrators of this fraud had issued "Berth Certificates" and given full disclosure that someone or something was being moved, transferred, conveyed or transported, it would be a different story and an actual Death Certificate would not be required. As it is, this misspelling has to be accounted for.  

They can't pretend that the baby died without a Death Certificate (one of the ways that an infant decedent estate trust is created) or claim that the baby waived their own estate (they are obviously too young for that when these "birth" certificates are created).  

Requirement 2: 

This comes into play a bit later in the game, where "federal" and municipal and territorial taxes are being alleged -- and enforced -- against Americans who were never federal, territorial or municipal persons.  

The primary way that people enter into one of these foreign statuses and become liable for foreign taxation is via being employed by a federal entity, specifically by the federal government or a federal government franchise.  

Once the British Territorial "Person" is created out of thin air and named after their American victim, they become subject to foreign laws requiring them to obtain a "Social Security Number" in order to have a job in the Queen or King's Service; this is identical to the same requirements imposed in all the "former" British Commonwealth countries, such as Canada, where British Territorial Subjects are required to obtain "Social Insurance Numbers".  

Americans, of course, are not required to do any such thing, but they were told -- by what they assumed was their government -- that they had to do this, so, by the millions, they did.  This led to an Adhesion Contract, further "adhering" them, like glue, to the Legal Presumption that they were British Territorial U.S. Citizens living in The United States and serving as volunteers in the British Territorial Merchant Marine Service as "Taxpayers" -- a Warrant Officer responsible for collecting taxes and tariffs and forwarding them to the British Territorial U.S. Treasury.  

Requirement 2 requires the Perpetrators to produce actual proof of this employment or any other "federal" employment that would serve to obligate Americans to pay these foreign taxes: Federal Income Taxes, Territorial "State" or Municipal or County Property Taxes, Estate Taxes, Gift Taxes, Inheritance Taxes, Utility Taxes, Gas or other Commodity Taxes, Sales Taxes, Stamp Taxes, Payroll Taxes, Franchise Taxes, Sales Taxes, and Tariffs. 

Requirement 3  

This stipulation forces the Perpetrators to produce proof that the American victim meets the requirements of the First Immigration and Naturalization Act which is still Public Law and part of the United States Statutes at Large, to qualify as a "United States Citizen". 

Part of the Perpetrator's Schtick is to pretend that the progeny of the original Federal Employees of the American Federal Republic somehow inherited their ancestors' "special" political status, but as the actual Public Law makes clear, Americans born within the borders of a State or even a Territory have to complete an entire long, knowing, fully disclosed and voluntary process and application 
to ever become United States Citizens. 

The only actual United States Citizens are long-since dead and no new ones have been created in the absence of our American Federal Republic being in operation, but this requirement is here nonetheless to preclude any off-the-cuff press-ganging, conscription, or other commercial malfeasance against living people on the basis of any unproven, undisclosed, and merely presumed to exist United States Citizen status. 

Requirement 4

This requirement is present to protect all colored persons, but specifically, Negroes, who were arbitrarily conscripted by having Municipal United States citizenship "conferred" upon them by the British Territorial Rump Congress following the so-called American Civil War hostilities.  

That despicable action was fully discussed in public and pertained only to former plantation slaves who were Negroes who were accused of being "stateless" in the Territorial "States" -- when in fact they were always accorded full nationality and accepted as members of our States of the Union. 

This provision requires the Perpetrators to prove that the victim is "colored" in the sense intended by the citizenship legislation and "grandfathers" him or her into the Equal Civil Rights contract, so that no British Territorial President, like Donald Trump, or Territorial Congress or Judge can deprive them of their form of Constitutional Guarantees by arbitrarily defining their "civil rights" as privileges under the British Territorial system. 

These people are Americans and are owed the guarantees and limitations of The Constitution of the United States of America as much as every other American.  It's not subject to the whims of British Territorial officials. 

Requirement 5

This speaks to additional adhesion contract presumptions offered by the Perpetrators, who attempt to excuse their actions by claiming that millions of Americans knowingly and voluntarily flocked to their doors and signed up to receive Federal Benefits or sought political asylum with the Federal Corporations and their foreign government sponsors. 

Given that Americans have to pay for all "Federal Benefits" offered to their employees and dependents,  and pay far more than these "benefits" are worth, this is an unlikely proposition at the best of times, and given that the Federal Employees are utterly dependent on their American Benefactors not only for jobs, but housing and permission to be here at all (Residence Act), it's also wildly unlikely that any American would ever knowingly and voluntarily seek any federal political asylum, either. 

Nonetheless, these endlessly deceitful foreign corporations and their Principals have alleged that all these Americans just showed up on their doorsteps like lost waifs, and knowingly and voluntarily applied for Federal benefits and political asylum, thereby becoming dependents of the foreign Federal Corporations ---- mainly by virtue of applying for a Social Security Number, and all the undisclosed adhesion contracts layered onto that, including the "presumed agreement" to pay the FICA tax and other Employment Taxes even if the person is self-employed or employed by an unincorporated American business.  

Requirement 5 forces the Perpetrators to prove that they gave all these Americans "full disclosure" prior to signing them up and bilking them of their money and their freedom --- which of course, the Perpetrators did not do and cannot prove.  

Taken together these Five Proofs pull the guts out of the Legal and Commercial Presumptions being used to disinherit, denigrate, and defraud Americans.  

We have been the victims of "lawfare" and disgusting commercial crimes that members of the Bar Associations have indulged as Undeclared Foreign Agents. 

And now, it's over.  The Bar Members either back water and obey their actual contract with the Americans, The Constitution of the United States of America, and "recognize" Americans as Americans, or they get arrested and hung as knowing criminals.  

As we have said from the beginning, this is not a matter of politics or opinion.  It is a matter of vast international commercial crime against innocent living people.  It began under the reign of Queen Victoria and spread worldwide. The Brits were the first victims.  

The Americans and people of the Commonwealth nations followed shortly after that.  In between, nations such as India were raped and pillaged by these same corporate mercenaries and criminals.  The same members of the Bar and the so-called "civilian military" bureaucracy were used as knowing and unknowing foot soldiers of this "blight upon humanity".   

At the bottom of it, profiting from the mayhem and misery, the banks and treasury departments; at the top of it, the Robber Baron industrialists and their paid off politicians acting as storefronts to give the appearance of a Constitutional Monarchy and a Constitutional Republic long after a sickening form of Corporate Feudalism had been enforced.  

And now, the offending corporations and their minions are going to die, on paper or in the streets; but, at least everyone will know what is going on and why.  The Bad Guys won't be confused as the Good Guys anymore.  And there won't be any doubt that there are plenty of Americans still alive, and lots of living Allies worldwide.  

Issued by: 
Anna Maria Riezinger -- Fiduciary
The United States of America
Alaska State Court Justice
In care of: Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 99652

13th September 2025

------------------
See this article and over 5500 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.