Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 8400 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason by anyone. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products. When you post a comment, it is in the public domain. You have no copyright that can be enforced against any other individual who comments here! Do not attempt to copyright your comments. If that is not to your liking please do not comment. Any attempt to copyright a comment will be deleted. Copyright is a legal term that means the creator of original content. This does not include ideas. You are not an author of articles on this blog. Your comments are deemed donated to the public domain. They will be considered "fair use" on this blog. People donate to this blog because of what Anna writes and what Paul writes, not what the people commenting write. We are not using your comments. You are putting them in the public domain when you comment. What you write in the comments is your opinion only. This comment section is not a court of law. Do not attempt to publish any kind of "affidavit" in the comments. Any such attempt will also be summarily deleted. Comments containing foul language will be deleted no matter what is said in the comment.


Saturday, December 5, 2020

Re-Labeling and Re-Branding -- Tricks of Corporate Propagandists

 By Anna Von Reitz

This past week I took time to show you an example of "Dissembling" and how that trick of the propaganda masters works, and how they use dissembling to make up new or totally unimportant arguments as a distraction away from the truth or the actual issue under discussion.  

In that case, they were trying to claim that The Nuremberg Code only applies to "experimental medicine", when in fact the Code says exactly what it applies to and it applies to all medical procedures and therapies.   

See the sleight of hand?  The "re-framing" of the information to make it appear to mean something else?  And the dishonesty involved, too?   

Yes, it is dishonesty, because I quoted the actual Code and wrote it down word-for-word and anyone who actually reads the words knows what it says and what it applies to.  There no honest argument possible, so they had to turn to dishonesty and try to "re-direct" the information to different erroneous conclusions. 

There was no excuse in the context of the discussion to claim anything else or different, but they did so in an attempt to obfuscate the simple truth and artificially limit the application of The Nuremberg Code, which fully admits and supports our absolute right to refuse any forced medical procedure or therapy, including forced vaccination. 

The Nazis didn't like it then and they don't like it now, but there it is. 

This same process of twisting and re-directing information and the meaning of information is demonstrated again by both "re-labeling" and "re-branding" information.  

With "re-branding" if a product doesn't succeed under one name or logo, the company promoting it simply renames and comes up with a new "package" for it.  Crispy Critter Cutlets becomes Kansas City Steaks.  The cute patchwork cut-outs of cows on the package becomes a black and white rendition of a red-eyed bull ---- and voila, the product is the same, but the name and package, the "brand" has changed, and the market will reliably react to this change. 

The name Nationalist Socialist Party (yet another oxymoron) has already been used by the Nazis unsuccessfully, so they just "adopted" the Democratic Party ---which was already full of zealous micro-managers of other people's business and assorted self-interested, pompous, not-so-bright hypocrites--- instead. 

The Swastika turned into a donkey.  And there you have it, the old Nazi Party successfully re-branded. Just as crooked and evil as ever.  It looks completely different--- blue donkeys instead of red swastikas--- and so, it all seems familiar, but.... it's familiar as the old Nazi group-think oppression, not anything akin to JFK's brand of Democrat.  

So, people think they are electing Democrats, and it says "Democrat" on the package, but---- Presto-change-o!   That's what re-branding does --- sells crap under a new "package" presentation.  And sometimes, they just steal an already successful brand, like "Democratic Party", and stuff their junk inside of it. 

What do you think happened when a Korean company famous for putting out cheap tools using pot metal instead of steel bought Stanley Tools?   

Please note that successful products that people actually want, don't do re-branding.  Cheerios, for example, have come in that same (successful) yellow package since before I was born.   

Successful products don't need to re-brand and aren't helped by re-branding. 

So you can take it to the bank that when people are engaged in "re-branding" anything, from hamburger to political parties, there's failure at the bottom of it. 

Until you realize that the "Democratic Party" has been used to re-brand something entirely different, you will be confused.  

You will think you are buying a Ford, because that is what the label and logo say, when in fact you are buying a Volkswagen Beetle calling itself a Mustang. 

Ask yourself---- 

Does today's Democratic Party have even the least little bit of a resemblance to the fair-minded and intelligent and yes, honest, organization led by JFK and RFK?  

Re-Labeling is similar to re-branding, in that the intent is to obscure the identity of something and "change it out" for something else.  

Death becomes "passing on".   A gas tank becomes a fuel tank which morphs into a hazardous substance container.   "Gay" becomes LGBT.  People become Persons. A newspaper becomes a "bird rag".  A toothbrush is a fang polisher. A man is transformed into a male, meaning an animal of the male gender.  And each one of these "re-labelings" subtly changes the color or meaning or both. 

Re-labeling, like re-branding, is routinely used for dishonest purposes, to make things appear in a different light or context, to limit or change meaning, or to distort reality--- sometimes for criminal purposes.  

Have you noticed that both the Common Cold and the Flu have disappeared?  So has bronchial pneumonia.  So has asthma.  So has cancer, diabetes and COPD, emphysema, and arteriosclerosis. 

But don't go dancing through the streets shouting, "Heart disease no longer exists!  Yay!  We don't call it "heart disease" anymore, so it's gone!".  

Because Heart Disease isn't gone.  And all those people are still in fact dying of Heart Disease, even if they call it Poopsidoopsie Virus. 

In this case, re-labeling is being used to "juice things up" and generate false death statistics and inflated horror stories.  "Twenty-five million people dead as a result of Poopsidoopsie Virus! [And Heart Disease and Diabetes, and COPD, and...]" 

"Poopsidoopsie Virus is .00025% more contagious than the Common Cold!  We need a total lockdown!" 

Read all about it.  And marvel at the gross irresponsibility and lack of professionalism motivating every word and deed of the supposed-to-be "American" Press Corps. 

----------------------------

See this article and over 2800 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

12 comments:

  1. ..
    "Until you realize that the "Democratic Party" has been used to re-brand something entirely different, you will be confused."

    Then they must also confuse the sheeple with the TERM Republican

    Lets face it there is only one "Party" - them vs us.

    Again this is nothing new at the latest its deceit-duplicity has increased since 1900 forward - but nothing new it has a real major start from 1213.

    The quasi-government giveth and taketh away



    Gratitude - We Bleed Red White and Blue

    ReplyDelete
  2. Al Capone had a poll voter deal even using guns on voters to get the votes for years and years for the mayor and keeping the crooks in charge with Capone believed to be in prison finally then dead actually living in Florida with sea access in a mansion doing business as usual. Did anyone go an visit Charlie Manson or wonder why media showed him wearing beads and long hair and beard flowery shirts and things that prisons would never allow like smarting off to guards and acting as though even the warden feared him and the sunglasses like how come no one thought to see if he was even in prison. They put it right in our face things so ridiculous that many see through it but the few, those who they want to keep around who swallow bowls up daily as truth get fooled every time and easy to control

    ReplyDelete
  3. Paul, do you or Anna have any suggestions or special instructions/procedure for applying for Social Security??? If so where do I find that info?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Social Security?? They are thieves. Are you ready to return to be US citizen of the British? They will ask you if you are a US citizen or not You have to answer yes so they can control you tax you forever on that money your supposed to receive from the New Deals. They changed the rule all the time. The thieves

      Delete
    2. Furthermore? They want you to agree to consent before you can electronically file for Social Security in other words, give them a blank check sign ahead of time. How unjust they are. Yes Anna addressed. Do a search, top right corner.

      Delete
    3. Jeff Wicka - you've "earned" Social Security so its not a "benefit" - If you're an American State National, this is good to know. Not a benefit.

      When you go, don't say you're a US Citizen, say you are an American State National if you are one. They might have a version of it to check the box or they write it in, i don't know.

      Beware & don't let them pull you back as a US Citizen. Go online & see their forms (as Americans we're really not supposed to use their forms, but we can't help it) see what info is there beforehand.

      When its time to sign try: By: __________(c) after your name, then below the line All rights reserved Without prejudice.
      Some folks also write Nunc pro tunc. Don't know if thats relevant or not.

      Hey, wonder if you could put your red ink thumbprint over your autograph... might be electronic, which makes it hard to write the full language. See if a form is available, print a couple out, use one for scratch.
      See if they'll allow you to provide the hard copy w autograph & red thumbprint. Don't forget your red ink pad! You can always use blood, eh, so carry a stick pin. Freak them out but good.

      Dunno if this helps. Stay sane

      Delete
  4. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Is there anywhere a link for the full Nuremberg code, unchanged of anything?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hey Shelby - thanks for the post, just copied it for later. Yeah the Nuremberg info at dirtybigpharmatruth found pretty good.

      Delete
  6. The Germans weren't Nazi's. The AshkeNAZI's were & are the Nazi's today BUILDING THEIR CONCENTRATION CAMPS aka FEMA Camps over 800 across America & Gulags across Canada right now.

    JEW NAZI Exposing the "Nazi" Epithet - Who started it, why, how, and ... It's time to debunk the "Nazi" epithet, and to show you where it came from, who invented it, and why. The fact is, that the term "Nazi" was created by the enemies of the National Socialists (the NSDAP). It was a pejorative term; an insult or a slur. https://justice4germans.wordpress.com/2013/04/16/exposing-the-nazi-epithet-who-started-it-why-how-and-who-benefits/

    JEW NAZI Father of Nazi philosophy, Alfred Rosenberg http://www.jewwatch.com/jew-domination-government.htm Alfred Ernst Rosenberg was a German theorist and an influential ideologue of the Nazi Party. Rosenberg was first introduced to Adolf Hitler by Dietrich Eckart and later held several important posts in the Nazi government. Wikipedia

    This is how the JEWS do it: Heiden wrote of the Final Solution becuz the JEWS invented it against their own JEWS - Funny how how JEWS then blame Great White Christian Germans for their own evils!

    Konrad Heiden (1901-1966) - Find A Grave Memorial https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/54714117 - His "The New Inquisition", published in New York in 1939, includes an eerie and accurate prediction of the Final Solution planned by the Nazi regime. He was most noted for the first influential biography of German dictator Adolf Hitler. He also wrote under the pseudonym Klaus Bredow.

    Here the little frucker AshkeNAZI JEW HEIDEN made it to Jew York City as a journalist to propagandize against Great White Germans calling them the Nazi's – Anna the jewdaizer can’t help herself but to LIE, DECEIVE, BETRAY to insure the JEWS LIES & PROPAGANDA reign forever more.

    JEW NAZI http://en.rightpedia.info/w/File:Konrad_Heiden.png Nazi (also the cognates Nazism and Neo-Nazism) is a political epithet that Konrad Heiden (7 August 1901 – 18 June 1966) invented during the 1920s as a means of denigrating the NSDAP and National Socialism.[1] Heiden was a journalist and member of the Social Democratic Party of Germany, whose mother was a Jewess. The term is both an imitation of the nickname given to Marxists of the SDP at the time, Sozi, and a political pun similar to the Austro-Bavarian word for "simpleton", derived from the fairly common name Ignatz (German language form of Ignatius). It was then popularised abroad by various Judaics and other subversives, including Heiden himself, who fled the country after the NSDAP were elected to government.
    The term was regarded as a derogatory epithet by National Socialists and was used almost exclusively by Marxist agitators. Typically the use of Nazi Germany, and Nazi regime, was popularized by Jewish émigrés from Germany after 1933., especially in English-speaking countries. From them, it spread into other languages.

    Very interesting to see these JEW BASTARDS born of satans backside & other jew filth, came from AUSTRIA.... JEWS IN AUSTRIA.... Kinda like those Habsburgs, eh Anna??

    Jew Nazi – an insult in use long before the rise of Adolf Hitler's party. It was a derogatory term for a backwards peasant – being a shortened version of Ignatius, a common name in Bavaria, the area from which the Nazis emerged. Opponents seized on this and shortened the party's title Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei [National Workers Party], to the dismissive "Nazi"

    thanks & stay sane

    ReplyDelete
  7. it was noted on skype today that everyone will receive a shot card will be able to avoid getting one I mean we don't need one how do we protect ourselves from getting one.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. frank martinez - yep, saw their card. Keep saying NO! My body, my choice.
      Carry your papers, like in Bolshevik jew Soviet Union. Push Nuremberg flyers. Here's the ones Anna found relevant, print this up nice, large, & legible:
      www.dirtybigpharmatruth.com/vaccines-are-in-direct-violation-of-the-nuremberg-code.html

      Vaccines are in direct violation of The Nuremberg Code
      Forced, coerced, and mandated vaccination are in violation of these principals.

      A VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 OF THE UNESCO 2005 STATEMENT ON BIOETHICS AND HUMAN RIGHTS
      Article 6, section 1:
      Any preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior, free and informed consent of the person concerned, based on adequate information. The consent should, where appropriate, be express and may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason WITHOUT DISADVANTAGE or prejudice. (caps mine)
      Article 6, section 3:
      In no case should a collective community agreement or the consent of a community leader or other authority substitute for an individual’s informed consent.

      Meanwhile:
      'No Vaccine, No Work' - Employers Discuss Making COVID Immunity Mandatory For Workers https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/no-vaccine-no-work-employers-discuss-making-covid-immunity-mandatory-workers
      Public opinion polls from the past couple of weeks appear to show a growing number of Americans are planning to get the coronavirus vaccine, even as Dr. Fauci hinted that the UK's decision to grant emergency approval to Pfizer's mRNA vaccine might have been somewhat "rushed".
      A recent Goldman research note intended for its institutional clients showed as much, citing polling numbers from YouGov.
      With hospitalizations surging to record levels and California once again heading into lockdown, millions of Americans would probably gladly take the vaccine just to feel a sense that the pandemic is "over", even though the duration of that immunity is still not very well understood, and some "conspiracy-minded" skeptics have raised question about the headline efficacy numbers.
      ... However, many corporations might soon find that their workers (not just blue-collar manufacturing workers, but white-collar office drones, too) either don't share their concerns, can't get their hands on a vaccine or are simply skeptical of the long-term side effects and would prefer to simply wait and see.
      Fortunately for these workers, US law offers a way to push back.

      The above links to: Can Employers Fire Any Employees That Choose Not To Take The COVID Vaccine?
      ttps://www.zerohedge.com/medical/can-employers-fire-any-employees-choose-not-take-covid-vaccine

      JUST AS THE JEWS DID IN BOLSHEVIK JEW SOVIET UNION. Same m/o.

      Delete

Place your comment. The moderator will review it after it is published. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason.