Two Confederations of the Original National States of States

By Anna Von Reitz

Confusing, yes?  But necessary. 

The First Confederation formed by the States during the Revolution (1781) was composed of National-Level States of States:  The State of Georgia, The State of Maine, The State of Connecticut..... and these States of States were business entities owned by the States called Georgia, Maine, Connecticut..... 

The States own The States of States.   Maine owns The State of Maine.  

The States formed a Federation of States known as The United States of America to function as a Holding Company for all the assets and powers that they would agree to hold in common.  The States specifically and through their Holding Company retained control of the land and soil jurisdictions of this country.  

That is, the States never gave up a cubic centimeter of soil or land to The States of States. 

And Once Again, Britain at the Bottom of the Dog Pile

By Anna Von Reitz

This is "Oldie But Goodie" information underscoring the secretive usurpation of our lawful government by the British-backed Territorial United States and the fraudulent means used to secure these deplorable results ---- again.  

The article I have linked to from the Daily Pen came across my desk again today and I was inspired to forward it on, because it so neatly summarizes the bulk of research that shows that Mr. Obama was in fact born in Kenya, a British Protectorate, and also shows where his actual birth records from the Protectorate are archived.  

http://thedailypen.blogspot.com/2012/07/obamas-kenyan-birth-records-discovered.html 

The [Territorial] United States office of "President" does not require that the man occupying that foreign office be natural born in these states.  He is merely a corporate CEO elected by shareholders and could come from the moon.  He didn't directly commit any crime, because the "Office of President" he occupies, he was eligible to occupy. 

That isn't really the point, though, is it?  

Why Is The Rest of the World Angry?

By Anna Von Reitz

Basically, it's because the [Territorial] United States went stark raving bonkers and attempted to absolutely control and dictate the financial and business affairs of all the other countries in the world.

They were dictating who could do business with whom, what currencies they could use to conduct business, how much they could spend with trading partners--- you name it, and the [Territorial] United States was trying to control everyone else's markets and micro-managing business affairs of the entire world.

So they forced all these other countries to band together in opposition to this oppression and suppression in restraint of trade and to form new alliances and new banks and new banking systems.

And what else would we expect them to do?

----------------------------

See this article and over 1000 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.

George Washington's Oaths

By Anna Von Reitz

There is a curious fact of history that deserves everyone's notice and understanding. 

George Washington took two Oaths of office.  

One was to The United States of America on April 6, 1789.  That is the political office owed to the land jurisdiction States and the American people holding the non-delegated powers.  

The other Oath of Office taken on April 30, 1789 was to the Federal United States and its new Constitution as President of the United States. That is the business office of the top executive of the Federal Government exercising the delegated powers.

One Supreme Office on the land and one on the sea.  

The President was supposed to stand with one foot on the land and one in the sea, able to provide for the orderly administration and  functioning of both jurisdictions to best serve the general welfare and benefit of the people and the country as a whole.