Tuesday, July 11, 2017

Public and Judicial Notice – Number 4

Citizenship is a form of indentured servitude to a government. It must be voluntary, it must be proven, and it must be equitable or it becomes unlawful peonage.

Foreign commercial corporations merely under contract to serve the American states and people have falsely claimed that we are all citizens and/or wards of their States of State franchises.

This is a gross, deliberate, and obvious falsification of the public records.
Absent proof of a federal paycheck that is earned in actual federal employment or in payment of an unearned federal dependency --which does not include retirees receiving military pension or Social Security payments---  no claims of federal citizenship are credible. 

The American states and people are the Paramount Security Interest Holders and Priority Creditors of all federal municipal and territorial corporations.  There is no motivation for us to voluntarily donate our interest as landlords or freely agree to subject ourselves to indentured servitude without payment or abandon all our children to the care of foreign corporations. 

Any such enslavement --- voluntary or involuntary--- is strictly forbidden under both national and international law.  

All members of the American Bar Association, the Territorial and Municipal Congress, the State of State federal franchise legislatures and all federal bankruptcy trustees are under demand to correct their operations on our shores and return the missing land assets.  Notice to Principals is Notice to Agents and Notice to Agents is Notice to Principals.

                                                  James Clinton Belcher, Head of State
                                                  United States of America


11 comments:

  1. Looks like we're back in operation!
    Thank-you, Sir!

    ReplyDelete
  2. No wonder why the courts and law enforcement are so defiant on fraud...!! THat's all there is out there. And it's hard to prove. It's much easier to charge someone with a "dime" bag of dope, than for prosecutors to build a case of fraud. And most criminals know it. By the time they actually catch these con men, they have already left a trail of people financially ruined by them. It has to get that bad before they will go after them. Until then, Drugs and domestic violence cases fill our jails. Smart??

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Excellent points, James. The bigger the fraud (and lie), the easier to get away with and weave their webs of deceit.

      Delete
  3. How can these Notices be used for humanities protection. United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights is a powerful document to invoke since United States is signatory to it. A while back North Dakota Tribes during their refusal for pipeline passage ended up invoking it. Anyone know when to invoke it in court cases. Arrainment only opprtunity is to say guilty, not guilty or no contest & a ones answer steers the steps of following course taken.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No, there is one more pleading that we are never taught and it's right in the penal code. Actually it represents a pre-pleading defense, which means it is not a "motion" that a judge can simply DENY. But they all try anyway. It's called a " DEMURRER". And it works very much like a " conditional acceptance" because it doesn't start a controversy and therefore doesn't give the court jurisdiction. But you only get one chance at it, and that's at arraignment. If you fail to do it, it is forever waived. You can demurred on the fact that the court has "failed to state a claim for which relief cannot be granted"[FRCP 12 (b)6]. But if the judge tries to deny it, object immediately, and remind the judge this is not a motion. It comes under pleadings and therefore can only be "sustained" or "overuled". And if he overruled it, he better be willing to give you an answer right on the spot since 3 sec. ago he was willing to deny it. He better be willing to prove why he overruled it right then and there or object immediately and go for a dismissal of the case. Don't let him get away with saying I will mail my answer later to you by mail....oh no you wont..!!! You dragged me hear under duress, wasted my time, and money. And you want me to just let me wait until it's convenient for you...i sternly object to that, unless you waive your right to taking "silent judicial notice" during the rest of this case. I won't plead until you answer that demurred. And not before. They are never ready or forgot how to handle demurrers, because all everyone ever heard in court is "not guilty" your honor. The worst pleading in the world. It immediately gives the court jurisdiction because it starts a controversy. Sit in court sometime and see how important the word "objection" is, especially to a DA.

      Delete
    2. One more thing, if the judge tries to overule it, he will most likely give you a lie. No one in that court has a "claim" on you. Because it refers to "title". Your title. They are simply trying to "claim jump" on your gold (your signiture). If he says the DA has charged you with this and that, so what. If she doesn't have a claim, then there are no charges...period. I demand the right to put the DA under "direct examination" right now to find out how she got a claim when I didn't even plead yet. Do those charges exists or don't they. Are the charges sitting right in front of you right now your honor...if he says yes, then ask him can I please see them. He doesn't have them. Watch him closely. If he has the same charging papers you have, he is looking at them upside down until you plead. He is looking at a blank sheet of paper. By now he knows your not going to be tricked easily. Wait for the antics to start. Ruffled feathers, pissed, and threatening you with contempt or other things. This is where your mind has to be strong. If you weaken at this point, he knows your scared. He is there to make you think you committed a crime without a true injured party, and attacking your conscious. Your job in court is to attack his conscious. He's the one commuting a crime. That's why they want you in court so bad. It is way easier for them to get jurisdiction when your face to face with your accusser, because it's a strange forum to us. But they are used to it and show very little fear from you, unless you start showing signs that you actually know what's going on. His attitude will change immediately when he learns that....

      Delete
  4. Beautiful words, JCB. I'd like to hear or add an "or else you will be subject to a Civilian Priority Creditor investigation, auditing, and vetting process which will likely lead to your full prosecution and punishment under the law" part at the end there. Thanks for being such a socio-political justice warrior!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Does anyone on this site realize that Obama is the antichrist and Pope Francis is the false prophet. I think our govt is getting ready to spring the Alien hoax on us soon. The more Trump turns things around in Washington, the more desperate the globalist become. This is more a spiritual war now, not a Constitutional one. The globalist are using all of Hollywood to denouce our new President and the politically connected to destroy Trump's attempt to Nationalize America again. These multi-international corporations depend on this system of fraud. Hope for the best but prepare for the worst.

    ReplyDelete
  6. One of the things I learned during the investigation of the "foreclosure fraud" is how the bookkeeping ledgering is done with Corp. There are two sets like Anna said. On and off sheet ledgering. But more specifically it is called their public onsheet bookkeeping ledgering(where liabilities are representing "assets) , and their private off sheet bookkeeping ledgering (where real assets are actually liabilities to them). That's the reason why you should Mark everything by demanding "lawful money"(12USC411) on anything demanding your signature. It will have to be listed on their off bookkeeping ledgering as a liability, and not an asset. Not good if they have already bonded the case for thousands of dollars. Instead of making money on you, they are going to lose by that amount. Therefore, if there is any controversy on who is telling the truth in court (a bank), demand an "AUDIT OF THE EQUITIES" be made to prove who is telling the truth, using a proven accountant into these types of books. If you keep pushing this they will definitely be scared. They don't want those books being exposed in a public forum. That's why the judge in my foreclosure case didn't want to accept my last filing in my foreclosure case. She was forewarned by the banks that I was most likely on to their scheme and told her to refuse my mailing without even opening it...which she did. But they all scratch each other's back. They won't even deal with you anymore on foreclosures unless you are represented by an attorney. It's all about protecting the books...!!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dear friends even represented by a lawyer/trustee/condo association here in Miami are forcing people out I have court tomorrow. A senator signed sayin yes there is fraud but the cop keep doing it. Paul may you contact me please.

      Delete

Place your comment. The moderator will review it after it is published. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason.