Ode to Sheriff Mack --- How To Get Enforcement of the Actual Law of the Land?

by Anna Von Reitz

People all over this country are complaining about "lack of enforcement" of the basic Organic and Public Laws.  I hate to break it to you, but you all have to take action in your own behalf to provide enforcement.  You are "self-governing"--- remember?   

The rats--- for profit governmental services corporations run by banks-- have usurped upon your lawful jurisdiction and set up incorporated "Counties" and incorporated "States".  As soon as you incorporate anything, it is removed from the jurisdiction of the land and taken out from under the Law of the Land (including the Constitution) and moved to the international jurisdiction of the sea and the Law of the Sea. 

As a result, you no longer have Sheriffs operating under the Law of the Land and you no longer have enforcement of the Organic and Public Laws.  What you have are men in "similarly named" private corporate offices---Mall Cops and commercial mercenaries-- who are charged with enforcement of "codes, regulations, and statutes" that apply only to the franchises and employees and officers of their respective (and often different) corporations.  

Throughout much of America, nobody is being paid to mind the store or provide enforcement of the Organic and Public Laws anymore.  So, now does it make sense why you have no access to the guarantees of The Constitution and no enforcement for the indictments of Common Law Grand Juries?  

To get action and enforcement you have to have a Common Law Sheriff operating the land jurisdiction of your county, and you also need an entire Common Law Court backing him up.  

There are basically three possibilities--- 

Where We Are In The Fraud Process Briefly Explained

by Anna Von Reitz

This country has been embezzled since the Civil War by foreign banking interests.

In 1868 some crafty lawyers and members of Congress operating as the Board of Directors of "The United States of America, Incorporated" adopted the actual Constitution---- a document known as "The Constitution for the united States of America" ---as the basis of their own corporate charter. They made a few minor changes, like changing the name to "the Constitution of the United States of America" and voila---- the name game began in earnest. They also incorporated the Municipal Government of the District of Columbia as the District of Columbia Municipal Corporation and issued a third similarly and deceptively named "Constitution" known as "the Constitution of the United States".

Armed with these deceptively named dopplegangers they began making "Amendments" by fiat. It's easy to amend a corporate charter so that's what they did with their "Constitution of the United States of America"---- added the 13th, 14th. 15th and so on without any mandated ratification process by the actual states on the land. Using this deceit they by-passed the actual Constitution owed to the organic, physically defined states. Instead, they created "Federal States" for themselves--- merely "inchoate" legal fictions on paper, and adopted names from the actual states on the land.

Prior to the 1870's the actual physically defined states used the names "State of Delaware", etc., after that period of time the "Federal States" began using these names, too, and the actual states on the land were named "Delaware State" and so on in the federal system.

About Federal Title 12 USC 95a and b2 - Who owns your property?

by Anna Von Reitz

I have read 12 USC 95a and b2 and all I see is the usual duplicitous lawyer-speak in which they offer a last minute used car salesman pitch---- the essence of the offer is, give us everything and we will pay your debts during your lifetime. After you die, our corporation owns your land and home and etc.,etc., in perpetuity.

Now I want to point out that this offer is being made by a bankrupt entity and the only way that they can possibly pay your bills during your lifetime is by selling your interest in your property. I also want to point out that you don't own things in the way that you think you do or that they claim you do. Every land asset is actually held in trust by the United Colonies of America, not any version of "United States" or "United States of America".

How to Restore the Land Jurisdiction Government Owed to Your County

by Anna Von Reitz

Millions of people are just waking up like disgruntled bears waking from a long hibernation, or maybe like me, when I can't find a cup of coffee in the morning.  However that may be I get all sorts of rambling, critical and mostly ignorant emails interspersed with hundreds of requests for help from people suffering from some aspect of abusive courts every day.  I cannot possibly answer them all, but I will take stabs at providing more general information that will help people take affirmative action in their own behalf. 

I want to point out that all American Common Law Courts are courts based on the land, practicing the Law of the Land.  Their jurisdiction is tied to the land as a result.  My court is in Alaska. I have no way to help someone in Idaho.  The people in Idaho have to help each other. That's the first big misunderstanding.  

The watery Federal Courts provide the same "service" in every state, just like Burger King delivers the same Whopper the same way 24/7 from San Francisco to Portland, Maine.  

Land Law doesn't work like that.  

This is Karen Hudes' latest excuse---

 the evil "Network of Global Control".     https://youtu.be/GbRK575ReG0

This "Network" was "discovered" by accident by statistical correlation by Dutch statisticians when in fact it is the known and predictable result of running the entire world as an interlocking trust directorate--- which is what we published as part of our affidavit:  You Know Something Is Wrong When.....An American Affidavit of Probable Cause" available at Amazon.com. 

I have to say, "Duh?  What do you expect to find in a statistical analysis of a known interlocking trust directorate???" 

Now Karen is trying to use this to excuse the theft of American gold and the gold owed other nations by the World Bank. 

It won't work. 

The World Bank was a Secondary Creditor in the 1933 Bankruptcy of the United States of America, Inc.  

They full-well knew that the Priority Creditor was the American People, and logically, their heirs and descendents. 

But when it came time for settlement and all the debts were paid off by those same American People --- nobody informed the Priority Creditors who were still alive, much less their heirs and beneficiaries. 

Instead, the World Bank came in as a Secondary Creditor and claimed the collateral assets owed to us under the pretense that our whereabouts and identities are unknown, and that the assets were "abandoned" by unknown heirs. 

I hope you all have your Shinola Sensors turned on to High Alert. I also hope that you are all as determined to see justice done as I am and that you will all stand up and demand not only return of your gold, but return of your land patents, your labor, your businesses and your families and cars and everything else that these vermin have claimed to own and use as collateral benefiting them and their organizations. 

Anna Von Reitz

---------------------------------------

See this article and over 100 others on Anna's website here:www.annavonreitz.com

To Betsy Hammond of the Oregonian RE "self appointed judge" showing up.

on January 12, 2016 at 4:48 PM, updated January 12, 2016 at 5:55 PM

In reference to your recent story in The Oregonian in which you said: 

"In late November, Anna Maria Riezinger, an Alaska woman who claims to be Judge Anna von Rietz under the same inaccurate reading of the Constitution that Doucette uses, ruled that the members of Congress, the president and the U.S. treasury secretary all committed crimes and directed U.S. marshals and FBI agents to arrest them.

Last week, Riezinger issued a statement about the Harney occupation. In it, she wrote that "The Hammonds and the Bundy Family are Priority Creditors of all the (government agencies) which are now or which have operated in this country in the past. ...They and their countrymen are owed the patent to all land within the geographically defined boundaries of their respective states, free and clear of liens, encumbrances, or other presumptions."

Hundreds of people who have used similar sovereign citizen arguments to justify failing to pay federal income taxes, getting drivers licenses or other government requirements have never prevailed in any court."

-- Betsy Hammond

________________

Ms. Hammond,