The Diabolical Nature of What Has Been Done

From Judge Anna

Every day I talk to knowledgeable patriots who nonetheless don't quite grasp the diabolical nature of what has been done to them by international corporations acting under color of law and pretending to "represent" their states of the union.

It's diabolical as a Chinese headlock, but simple really:

We are born on the land and are considered heirs of the land assets of our country.

But within hours undeclared agents of the federal "State" franchise get our Mothers to sign Certificates of Live Birth. These documents are misrepresented as simple recordings of the baby's birth. Instead, they are registrations of commercial "vessels" using the baby's name, and serving to make the "State" franchise the beneficiary of the baby's estate on the land.

However many days, weeks, or months later as determined by "State" law, your "vessel in commerce" is reported "missing, presumed dead" to the probate court, which then doctors the civil records and converts your living estate to a trust ESTATE benefiting the perpetrators of this scheme.

You are now officially "dead" with respect to the land jurisdiction and unless you take action to correct the probate court records, you and your assets are permanently trapped in the international jurisdiction of the sea. You are therefore unable to take recourse to your holdings on the land or the law forms of the land that you are owed. Ever heard the Constitution called the "Law of the Land"?

This is why your constitutional guarantees don't apply. There's no version of "you" operating on the land as a result of this fraud.

The Correct Gun Control Argument

Putting Gun Control In Its Proper Perspective by Judge Anna

I have been thinking something for the past five years I would love to share with everyone in America.

Why is it that Obama and his Democrat friends are always calling on everyone else to give up their guns? If they are against guns, why are they buying millions of them, and billions of rounds of ammo to go with them?

Hmm?

Why not lead by example?

Why not turn in all the "federal agency" guns and all the commercial mercenary army guns that have been purchased with our tax money for starters?

After that, Mr. Obama and Mr. Biden and all their friends and cohorts all across the nation and all the people who are "afraid of guns" ---- can safely divest themselves of all those dangerous firearms in their possession.

Nobody will complain or try to stop them from disarming themselves.

I would be willing to collect all the Democrat-owned firearms in America and see to it that these orphaned firearms find good homes with new owners who appreciate the beauty and value of good, useful tools.

The entire argument about "gun control" needs to be turned on its head. If the Democrats are worried about being able to control their guns, by all means, they should be allowed to lock them up in a safe place or turn them in to the nearest American National Guard Unit.

The rest of us who feel competent to use tools only when appropriate don't have a problem with guns. It's Mr. Obama and his buddies who have their knickers in a knot about guns, so it would seem that they should be the first and willing ones to divest themselves of guns.

Right?

Makes sense to me.

Afterall, we aren't forcing a single Democrat-Flower Child- Nature Worshiping Demi-Urge or anyone else to own guns. We are just maintaining our own right and responsibility to do so---- and the words "shall not be infringed" are pretty straight forward.