Thursday, February 7, 2013

Sandy Hook possible false flag event?

Sandy Hook: Law Enforcement Officials Now Admit Possibility of Multiple Shooters

In a shocking twist of events lending credence to’s investigation, it has now been admitted by officials that there is a potential that multiple shooters carried out the bloody massacre that took place at the Sandy Hook Elementary School the morning of December 14, 2012.
By Shepard Ambellas
February 6, 2013
NEWTOWN — New information has now been brought forth by Connecticut State Attorney Stephen Sedensky, suggesting that records pertaining to the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting have been sealed to possibly hide the identity of witnesses from multiple shooter suspects and that they should not be unsealed anytime soon.
Officials fear the safety of witnesses.

Gun Grabbers paint target on their own backs!

How the post-Sandy Hook gun control push spectacularly backfired in America
This article by Mike Adams of Natural News really ties it up about what will happen and how Americans will stop the gun grabbers cold in their tracks (literally) if they physically try to collect the guns with force from law abiding people around the country.

Mike doesn't pull any punches here.
May I say in addition to his well thought out scenario:

These gun grabbers are OUTLAWS, who won't abide by the supreme law for the United States, the US Constitution. They are willing to use force to get what they want. They are willing to incite violence against the lawful civil authority of We the People, and are willing to destroy the peace and good order of our communities to take our freedom and only means of self defense. They are seditionists, and when this turns violent, then they fulfill the very definition of treason. They fulfill the very definition of tyrants.

A Sedition is defined as: incitement of violence to overthrow lawful civil authority

The gun grabbers are willing to incite violence against the lawful civil authority of We the People who wrote the US constitution for GOVERNMENT TO FOLLOW, not the other way around.

A tyrant is defined in Miriam Webster as:
A. an absolute ruler unrestrained by law or constitution  or B. a usurper of sovereignty

The gun grabbers qualify eminently on both counts. They are tyrants, one and all.

Treason is defined as: A person commits the crime of treason if he levies war against his state or country or sides to its enemies, giving them aid and comfort. 

The gun grabbers have declared war on the American people, and everything they propose gives aid and comfort to our enemies, whether they be criminals looking to commit crimes, or other governments, or even domestic enemies within our own government who are themselves also traitors.

We will win this in the end. They can't impose a police state in Amerika, which is what they want, without taking the guns first. That is the history of gun control throughout history. They are arrogant and will stop at nothing. Really they are not just coming for your guns. THEY ARE COMING TO KILL YOU!

The gun grabbers want all those who oppose them to die! They are leftist progressives who have killed over 170 million people just in the 20th Century alone. Look at the history of gun control here:

Read Mikes great article here:

Obama gives himself permission to kill you!

Andrew Napolitano asks: When will president's drone murders come home to our shores?

After stonewalling for more than a year federal judges and ordinary citizens who sought the revelation of its secret legal research justifying the presidential use of drones to kill persons overseas – even Americans – claiming the research was so sensitive and so secret that it could not be revealed without serious consequences, the government sent a summary of its legal memos to an NBC newsroom earlier this week.
This revelation will come as a great surprise, and not a little annoyance, to U.S. District Court Judge Colleen McMahon, who heard many hours of oral argument during which the government predicted gloom and doom if its legal research were subjected to public scrutiny. She very reluctantly agreed with the feds, but told them she felt caught in “a veritable Catch-22,” because the feds have created “a thicket of laws and precedents that effectively allow the executive branch of our government to proclaim as perfectly lawful certain actions that seem on their face incompatible with our Constitution and laws, while keeping the reasons for their conclusion a secret.”
Read more at 

Montana leads to stop drone use in our state!

Here is where you can track all the various states working on anti drone legislation.