Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 8400 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason by anyone. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products. When you post a comment, it is in the public domain. You have no copyright that can be enforced against any other individual who comments here! Do not attempt to copyright your comments. If that is not to your liking please do not comment. Any attempt to copyright a comment will be deleted. Copyright is a legal term that means the creator of original content. This does not include ideas. You are not an author of articles on this blog. Your comments are deemed donated to the public domain. They will be considered "fair use" on this blog. People donate to this blog because of what Anna writes and what Paul writes, not what the people commenting write. We are not using your comments. You are putting them in the public domain when you comment. What you write in the comments is your opinion only. This comment section is not a court of law. Do not attempt to publish any kind of "affidavit" in the comments. Any such attempt will also be summarily deleted. Comments containing foul language will be deleted no matter what is said in the comment.


Friday, July 20, 2012

Obama a British subject ? Look in Britain


WHERE LIES GO TO DIE – Evidence discovered shows British Protectorate of East Africa recorded Obama’s birth records before 1963 and sent returns of those events to Britain’s Public Records Office and the Kew branch of British National Archives.

  Sometimes we need to go outside the controlled American media to discover the truth about what is really going on. This seems to be one of those times.


7 comments:

  1. First, this sign of an error: The British Protectorate of East Africa had its name changed in 1920. After that it was known as THE KENYA COLONY. So, the claim that the files were looked into is a lie. The files would have been called Kenya Colony, not British Protectorate of East Africa.

    Next, the fact is that a grand total of 21 people came to the USA from Kenya in 1961. Twenty-one. Only 21. And only one person flew from Kenya to the USA (and it has always been the birther story that Obama's mother flew.)

    What are the odds that Obama’s mother flew ALONE (WND has proven with a FOI Act request that Obama’s father was in Hawaii in August 1961) late in pregnancy from Hawaii to Kenya, about ten thousand miles?

    What are the odds that she did that despite the Kenyan government saying that it never happened? And that is indeed what the Kenyan government has said.

    What are the odds that she made the flight, despite the government of Kenya saying that that it never happened AND there is a birth certificate for Obama in Hawaii?

    The birth certificate has been confirmed by officials of both parties in Hawaii, further confirmed by the public Index Data file ( a public file showing the birth certificate in the records showing one for Obama in 1961) and by the birth notices in the Health Bureau Statistics section of the newspapers in Hawaii in 1961---which notices at the time were only sent to the papers by the DOH of Hawaii, and which only sent out notices for births in Hawaii in 1961.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Then it should be easy for Obama to prove he is eligible to be president by just releasing all pertinent documents. Why has he spent millions of dollars covering all this up?
    Why should Americans have to wonder at all about whether the man in the white house is really the president? There should be NO question, but there are many. The ball is in his court but he refuses to release anything but fraudulent documents.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The answer is that he hasn't spent millions. He hasn't spent anything. Where did you get the mythical figure from?

    Obama has shown his birth certificate from Hawaii TWICE, the short form and the long form. And the facts on them have been repeatedly confirmed by the officials in Hawaii. Want to see four or five confirmations???

    And they are further confirmed by the Index Data. Want to see it too? And still further confirmed by the birth notices in the Hawaii newspapers that in 1961 were only sent to the papers by the DOH of Hawaii, which only sent out the notices for children who received Hawaii birth certificates, and in 1961 the DOH was only allowed to issue a birth certificate to a child who was BORN IN HAWAII.

    There is now good evidence that some of the people who claimed that Obama's birth certificate was forged are lying:

    http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2012/07/indicting-the-sheriff-joe-and-the-cold-case-posse/

    Here are some experts who say that Obama's birth certificate was not forged:


    Dr. Neil Krawetz, an imaging software analysis author and experienced examiner of questioned images, said: “The PDF released by the White House shows no sign of digital manipulation or alterations. I see nothing that appears to be suspicious.”

    Nathan Goulding with The National Review: “We have received several e-mails today calling into question the validity of the PDF that the White House released, namely that there are embedded layers in the document. There are now several other people on the case. We looked into it and dismissed it. … I’ve confirmed that scanning an image, converting it to a PDF, optimizing that PDF, and then opening it up in Illustrator, does in fact create layers similar to what is seen in the birth certificate PDF. You can try it yourself at home.”

    John Woodman, independent computer professional, said in a series of videos that the claims of fakery that he examined were unfounded.

    Ivan Zatkovich, who has testified in court as a technology expert, and consultant to WorldNetDaily: "All of the modifications to the PDF document that can be identified are consistent with someone enhancing the legibility of the document." (WND did not quote that part of his statement. I wonder why?)

    Further research on the birther claims that Obama's birth certificate is forged:

    http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2012/03/book-review-a-question-of-eligibility/#more-16786

    http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2012/03/obama-conspiracy-theories-blog-launches-investigation-into-sheriff-joes-cold-case-posse/

    http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2012/03/decoding-the-long-form-part-1/

    http://www.thefogbow.com/arpaio-report/

    http://www.obamabirthbook.com/http:/www.obamabirthbook.com/2012/03/on-the-release-of-report-from-sheriff-joe-arpaio-stating-barack-obamas-birth-certificate-is-a-forgery/

    ReplyDelete
  4. I don't believe a word of it. All of what you present is just part of the ruze. This man is a communist and deserves to be arrested and charged with treason.

    http://www.newswithviews.com/Kincaid/cliff629.htm

    There is overwhelming evidence and it's growing daily and I will leave your comments up, but I don't buy it, not for a minute.
    My view is that Obama is a subversive and imposter. His actions speak for themselves, regardless of his birth or history. They are the actions of a tyrant and dictator who is not worthy of the office.
    Enough said. You can say all you want but sorry I don't buy it.
    Let people who read this article and comments decide for themselves.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Well dream on. It has been about week since the Sheriff's press conference, and no one has called for an investigation. Could it be that they do not believe the dear sheriff?

    As for Obama being a "subversive and imposter." Well, you have the right to vote against him, and I would fight to the death for your right to do that.

    But there is overwhelming evidence that he was born in Hawaii, and the claims of the "it-was-forged" crowd are not believed by anyone sensible. Ann Coulter, Glenn Beck and the National Review all say that birthers are crazy.

    The CONSERVATIVE Secretary of State of Arizona accepted as evidence the latest confirmation from Hawaii, and put Obama on the ballot.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Well, more than two months have passed since Sheriff Joe's press conference, and nothing has happened.

    There continues to be overwhelming evidence that Obama was born in Hawaii, and the claims of the "it-was-forged" crowd are not believed by anyone sensible. Ann Coulter, Glenn Beck and the National Review all say that birthers are crazy.

    ReplyDelete
  7. On November 6, the man who Sheriff Joe claimed had forged his birth certificate (but who lied in those claims) was re-elected President of the United States. He won both a solid majority of the popular vote (more than than and a half million votes more than Romney) and a significant majority of the Electoral College (so far 303 votes, while only 270 are needed to win).

    ReplyDelete

Place your comment. The moderator will review it after it is published. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason.