OVERLOOKED LANGUAGE IN NDAA (H.R. 1540 & S. 1867)
By: Devvy
December 26, 2011
http://www.newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd519.htm
The Internet has been literally burning up over the National Defense Authorization Act. Another monstrous bill with language that has produced headlines like: "Obama is going to ship Americans to Gitmo!!!" And, "Americans will be detained indefinitely in secret without due process!!!!" There is this dire prediction:
Storing 7 Days of Food Could Send You to Gitmo Indefinitely
"The real danger lies in the government's definition of what a suspected terrorist is.
Read the entire article here:
http://www.newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd519.htm
"A provision of S. 1867, or the National Defense Authorization Act bill, written by Senators John McCain and Carl Levin, declares American soil a battlefield and allows the President and all future Chief Executives to order the military to arrest and detain American citizens, innocent or not, without charge or trial. In other words, if this bill passes and the President signs it, OWS protesters or any American could end up arrested and indefinitely locked up by the military without the guaranteed right to due process or a speedy trial."
Monday, December 26, 2011
Montanans Launch Recall of Senators Who Approved NDAA Military Detention
Montana law expressly provides for the recall of US Senators for violation of their oath of office and other crimes.
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?342222-Montanans-Launch-Recall-of-Senators-Who-Approved-NDAA-Military-Detention.-Merry-Christmas
Montana is one of nine states with provisions that say that the right of recall extends to recalling members of its federal congressional delegation, pursuant to Montana Code 2-16-603, on the grounds of physical or mental lack of fitness, incompetence, violation of oath of office, official misconduct, or conviction of certain felony offenses.
Section 2 of Montana Code 2-16-603 reads:
"(2) A public officer holding an elective office may be recalled by the qualified electors entitled to vote for the elective officer's successor."
The website Ballotpedia.org cites eight other states which allow for the recall of elected federal officials: Arizona, Colorado, Louisiana, Michigan, Nevada, North Dakota, Oregon, and Wisconsin. New Jersey's federal recall law was struck down when a NJ state judge ruled that "the federal Constitution does not allow states the power to recall U.S. senators," despite the fact the Constitution explicitly allows, by not disallowing ("prohibited" in the Tenth Amendment,) the states the power to recall US senators and congressmen:
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?342222-Montanans-Launch-Recall-of-Senators-Who-Approved-NDAA-Military-Detention.-Merry-Christmas
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?342222-Montanans-Launch-Recall-of-Senators-Who-Approved-NDAA-Military-Detention.-Merry-Christmas
Montana is one of nine states with provisions that say that the right of recall extends to recalling members of its federal congressional delegation, pursuant to Montana Code 2-16-603, on the grounds of physical or mental lack of fitness, incompetence, violation of oath of office, official misconduct, or conviction of certain felony offenses.
Section 2 of Montana Code 2-16-603 reads:
"(2) A public officer holding an elective office may be recalled by the qualified electors entitled to vote for the elective officer's successor."
The website Ballotpedia.org cites eight other states which allow for the recall of elected federal officials: Arizona, Colorado, Louisiana, Michigan, Nevada, North Dakota, Oregon, and Wisconsin. New Jersey's federal recall law was struck down when a NJ state judge ruled that "the federal Constitution does not allow states the power to recall U.S. senators," despite the fact the Constitution explicitly allows, by not disallowing ("prohibited" in the Tenth Amendment,) the states the power to recall US senators and congressmen:
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?342222-Montanans-Launch-Recall-of-Senators-Who-Approved-NDAA-Military-Detention.-Merry-Christmas
U.S. Agents Launder Mexican Profits of Drug Cartels
The history of a Federal Conspiracy to end Freedom and Liberty in America and replace them with a police state.
http://oathkeepers.org/oath/2011/12/19/new-york-times-u-s-agents-launder-mexican-profits-of-drug-cartels/
By Ginger ThompsonPublished: December 3, 2011
WASHINGTON — Undercover American narcotics agents have laundered or smuggled millions of dollars in drug proceeds as part of Washington’s expanding role in Mexico’s fight against drug cartels, according to current and former federal law enforcement officials.
The agents, primarily with the Drug Enforcement Administration, have handled shipments of hundreds of thousands of dollars in illegal cash across borders, those officials said, to identify how criminal organizations move their money, where they keep their assets and, most important, who their leaders are.
Read the entire article here:
http://oathkeepers.org/oath/2011/12/19/new-york-times-u-s-agents-launder-mexican-profits-of-drug-cartels/
The War on Drugs has eviscerated the Bill of Rights in our Constitution and has assaulted the spirit and letter of the U.S. Constitution. The War on Drugs is un-Constitutional on its face, and has been used to weaken our Constitutional protections for American citizens, while at the same time damaging the sovereignty of the several autonomous nation-state Republics which are party to the compact which created the Federal Union.
http://oathkeepers.org/oath/2011/12/19/new-york-times-u-s-agents-launder-mexican-profits-of-drug-cartels/
By Ginger ThompsonPublished: December 3, 2011
WASHINGTON — Undercover American narcotics agents have laundered or smuggled millions of dollars in drug proceeds as part of Washington’s expanding role in Mexico’s fight against drug cartels, according to current and former federal law enforcement officials.
The agents, primarily with the Drug Enforcement Administration, have handled shipments of hundreds of thousands of dollars in illegal cash across borders, those officials said, to identify how criminal organizations move their money, where they keep their assets and, most important, who their leaders are.
Read the entire article here:
http://oathkeepers.org/oath/2011/12/19/new-york-times-u-s-agents-launder-mexican-profits-of-drug-cartels/
The War on Drugs has eviscerated the Bill of Rights in our Constitution and has assaulted the spirit and letter of the U.S. Constitution. The War on Drugs is un-Constitutional on its face, and has been used to weaken our Constitutional protections for American citizens, while at the same time damaging the sovereignty of the several autonomous nation-state Republics which are party to the compact which created the Federal Union.