If he didn't have anything to hide, why did he try to put the issue to rest with a phoney document?
If you don't believe it's a phoney document you need to see this website, which is a compendium of the actions taken by many diverse groups that have all come to the same conclusion idependently of one another.
http://obamaeligibility.org/category/pro-se/american-grand-jury-presentments/
If Obama has nothing to hide why the coverup. Why are there dozens of lawsuits on the issue.
The website above is just one of many, but it's huge.
I challenge anyone to answer it's questions from law and verifiable facts.
Think of the ramifications if what they are saying is true. If Obama never WAS the president because of ineligiblity then everything he signed would have to be reversed including all the money appropriatioins, all the appointments, all the so called stimulus money etc. A real Constitutional CRISIS.
That leaves out the criminality of presenting for election a candidate that was not capable of holding the office, which is exactly what the Democrat National Committee might have done.
The evidence seems to be overwhelming.
