Excuses for more War are what this is all about. This will come to and end because of one fact. We can no longer afford these expenses, regardless of and proposed justifications for further wars.
Paul.
http://www.thedailybell.com:80/2479/Does-the-Elite-Need-a-False-Flag.html
The Daily Bell, Friday, June 10, 2011 – by Staff Report
Panetta to inherit Afghanistan dilemma ... With Americans still coming home in flag-draped caskets from Iraq, CIA director Leon Panetta (left) revealed a surprising – and to many, no doubt, confusing – fact. "There are 1,000 al-Qaeda that are still in Iraq," he said. "We saw the attack that was just made the other day. It too continues to be a fragile situation." That's right - 1,000 al-Qaeda in Iraq where the U.S. has fewer than 50,000 troops. In Afghanistan, where there are twice as many American troops, intelligence estimates put the number of al Qaeda at no more than 100, reports CBS News senior national security correspondent David Martin. – CBS
Dominant Social Theme: It's a long, hard road to victory.
Free-Market Analysis: Americans are war-weary but Leon Panetta (left) sees reasons to fight on. Al-Qaeda is still active and as long as al-Qaeda exists (see above article excerpt) America needs to fight. The struggle is taking place "Over There," so Americans do not have to fight al-Qaeda "Over Here." CIA Director Panetta made his remarks on Capitol Hill where he attended a hearing regarding his confirmation as Secretary of Defence.
Read this entire article here:
http://www.thedailybell.com/2479/Does-the-Elite-Need-a-False-Flag.html
Upcoming US Nuclear Event?
http://www.thedailybell.com/2422/Upcoming-US-Nuclear-Event.html
The Daily Bell, Tuesday, May 31, 2011 – by Staff ReportThe stage has been set for a nuclear false flag in America. Many in the alternative media have wondered if a false flag nuke attack within America is a real possibility. Would they do it? Who would it be? What cities would be targeted? Recently, The New York Times reported that the United States is running out of a rare gas that is used to detect smuggled nuclear materials. The reason given is that one arm of the Energy Department is selling the gas much quicker than the other is able to accumulate it. While this could possibly be a legitimate reason, it seems highly suspicious that a government that is installing a police state nationwide to supposedly save us from terrorists would be unable to obtain the gas needed to detect smuggled nuclear weapons. Wouldn't a nuclear attack on America be the MOST important threat to combat? Unfortunately there is a long history of suspicious nuclear activity in the United States, with cover story after cover story being spread throughout the corporate controlled media. At this junction in history it seems prudent to lay out some of the more ludicrous stories that have been planted into the minds of the American people. – Intel Hub
Dominant Social Theme: Why the heck would they do something like that? It's idiotic. The only people planning to blow up the world live in caves in Afghanistan and Pakistan.
Free-Market Analysis: Could the Anglo-American power elite sponsor a nuclear attack on American soil in order to deepen the phony war on terror? Would this group of old men running the world's most powerful banking families, be so devious? According to Intel Hub, the answer is yes.
Read the rest and then get ready:
http://www.thedailybell.com/2422/Upcoming-US-Nuclear-Event.html
